Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Cox (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Kristen Eriksen (talk) 05:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Carol Cox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
There's no assertion of notability and while I don't deal with PORNBIO very often, she does not seem to meet the guidelines listed there. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:24, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Dismas|(talk) 06:56, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article needs expanding, but there are some reliable sources in the external links section. Epbr123 (talk) 12:53, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Epbr. David in DC (talk) 02:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Epbr. Dismas|(talk) 03:14, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.