Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian post-hardcore
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Christian post-hardcore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete is this a definable and notable genre? is this article the right start? no sources, no context, no nothing... Carlossuarez46 (talk) 16:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It barely isn't A1 because of the second sentence even though it really doesn't help the context by adding two bands to it. I'll agree that there isn't any sources and thus fails WP:GNG. Tavix | Talk 16:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix | Talk 16:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix | Talk 16:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an unsourced arbitrary combination of two topics. Jclemens (talk) 17:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - technically, this could be speedily deleted due to lack of context. I found 14,300 Ghits, but nothing in Google news. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrocrunk. Bearian (talk) 18:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not only does the article not have any sources.....it doesn't really have any information. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.