Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Lee (solicitor)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 18:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Christine Lee (solicitor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
per WP:BIO1E and WP:BLP1E, this person is not notable outside of a single event, and does not have lasting/persistent notability. WP:BLPCRIME also applies. Wikipedia is not a newspaper or an indiscriminate collection of information. Our focus on her as a person fails certain privacy standards as well, as she is not a politician or celebrity. She is extremely likely to remain a low-profile individual. Therefore, it is almost impossible to maintain a NPOV on her life, given that her coverage will be UNDUE and focused on smaller news reports. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 14:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 14:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 14:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 14:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 14:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 14:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete but don't redirect to Barry Gardiner as he wasn't the only parliamentarian involved. I am the creator of this article and it appears I made a mistake doing so per WP:BLP1E. LondonIP (talk) 01:13, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.