- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy close. Ongoing harassment. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:09, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- David Eppstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article is irrelevant and does not deserve an encyclopedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hebozhong (talk • contribs)
- Speedy close and keep. Appears to be a bad faith nom by an SPA with only 2 edits whose very first edit was to list this article for an AfD. No valid policy-based reason for deletion given. Nsk92 (talk) 01:28, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The nominator appears likely to be a sockpuppet of two other SPAs User:Theanimalstyle86 and User:Electricsoupie who in the last couple of days harassed the article[1][2][3]. None of these SPAs have made any other edits outside this topic. Based on this edit[4] whomever this is appears to be upset about some action of the David Eppstein as a Wikipedia admin. Probably deserves a sockpuppetry report and further investigation. Nsk92 (talk) 01:50, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. No policy-based reason for deletion given, even ignoring the fact that the user's first edit was to nominate this for deletion. Celarnor Talk to me 01:43, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.