Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Van

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily kept as rewritten bio substub. FCYTravis 06:18, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Van

~~Vanity nonsense~~ FCYTravis 04:04, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as Eric Van is somewhat notable as "the online statistical guru of Red Sox Nation," but the article needs a major cleanup. Sycthos ^Talk 04:10, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Ginar 04:17, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ter e nc e Ong 04:27, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP, and do not blank content while in AfD 70.18.161.203 04:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- What I removed was POV, OR, nonsense *and* unencyclopedic. FCYTravis 04:49, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep verifiable stub I created. FCYTravis 04:48, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. In response to the previous weak keep comment, this article has not been stubbed. No worries, I have stubbed it accordingly to give it a chance. A one sentence article about a Red Sox statistician is not encyclopedic, and the information presented in past versions from the history section were arguably useless. This one sentence can easily be plugged into the team's main article, or it can simply and effectively be deleted. – Я не имею никакой жизни | существую 05:56, 15 January 2006 (UTC))[reply]
keep please that was confusing for a moment but it is good now Yuckfoo 10:04, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if we're talking about FCYTravis's version, Delete as unsalvagable nonsense otherwise. -Colin Kimbrell 17:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep for FCYTravis's version. --King of All the Franks 17:34, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the current version as notable and verifiable. Turnstep 18:22, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep but needs expansion, why isn't this stubbed -- SusanLarson ^{(User Talk, New talk, Contribs)} 19:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable biography. No Guru 21:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.