Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esperanza Gomez (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza Gomez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails gng and pornbio. Interviews are primary sources and dont count to notability. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - reckless nomination. Spartaz, look at the sources in the article again and explain how they can be dismissed as just pure interviews. If you don't understand Spanish, use Google Translate. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:32, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nothing notable here. Fails GNG. Montanabw^(talk) 08:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a large proportion of this article is trivia cited to interview, as in:

"She says, she initially intended to study agronomy at university, but changed to veterinary medicine after being told that agronomists were "impoverished, dirty and brutish."

K.e.coffman (talk) 22:54, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.