Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essential COSTA RICA

Essential COSTA RICA

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references are either primary, or related to Costa Rica only/majorly. An alternative might be to merge/redirect to Costa Rica DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 08:38, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Costa Rica-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:28, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DoctorWhoFan91; I have read WP:PRIMARY and it's pretty similar to the one we have at es.wikipedia, where primary sources are allowed under a series of circunstances, which I think I followed in the redaction of the article. I also read WP:DEL-REASON and don't find the reasons you have claimed to delete the article listed (even though is not a limited-list), specially the one stating that the sources are costarrican-related. Finally, I would object to redirecting to the Costa Rica article because the nation brand is way different than the country themselves. I will try to find additional, no-costarrican sources to complement the article. Thanks for your imput! LuchoCR (talk) 19:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge select content to Tourism in Costa Rica A lot of this is just corporate information when the focus to the general reader should be on tourism rather than minutia about how Panasonic is the country's official Blu-ray player and consultant awards. Nate • (chatter) 23:57, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]