- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fox Theta Delta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced content. Will add discussion to WP:FRAT. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 01:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: almost unintelligible. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 09:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Lack of reliable sources to back up any claim that this is a notable fraternity. —C.Fred (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google search does not give reliable sources to back up notability.--Lenticel (talk) 00:13, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, looks like it was written by a member of the said fraternity, doesn't look like it passes notability (yet). IMO, not as notable as, say, Alpha Phi Omega (with its [in]famous Oblation Run) and other notable Philippine collegiate fraternities, or the USA's Phi Beta Kappa and other equally notable college frats. --- Tito Pao (talk) 05:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.