- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:18, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fricker's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not encyclopedic per WP:NOTGUIDE Racconish Tk 05:37, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Referenced only to a "Yellow Pages" style of website and the restaurant's own, and with no significant third-party coverage found to improve this, there is a clear failure to meet notability requirements per WP:CORP. RichardOSmith (talk) 06:22, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No establishment of wp:notability. With 17 locations, probably could meet it, but there's no sourced encyclopedic content here worth saving. North8000 (talk) 10:37, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found zero significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 21:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete For not meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 19:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.