Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary L. Francione

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)

Gary L. Francione

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Have looked through Google News and Google Scholar for WP:RS. Can't find anything more than a passing mention in an RS. Doesn't seem to meet WP:NOTABILITY. Empamazing (talk) 18:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 18:21, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 18:21, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 18:21, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 18:21, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep For a start, meets criterion #5 of WP:NACADEMICS - "Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable. " Edwardx (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. I hadn't encountered that page when I did the readings about the notability criteria. Good to know! Empamazing (talk) 18:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.