Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl Candy Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Girl Candy Films

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not show notoriety, WP:NCORP. Weakly referenced. Guilherme Burn (talk) 12:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As referenced in the article, it won the 2013 AVN award for Best New Line. That it might need additional references is not grounds for deletion. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 13:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I tried to find but didn't found much, could pass WP:GNG due to award winning company. Mia Watson (talk) 17:07, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:CORP fail without significant coverage by independent reliable sources. The studio gets some trivial mentions in the mainstream press. The references in the article appear to be reworked press releases. Finally, industry awards outside porn don't count for much without independent RS interest. Inside porn, AVN's independence from the porn companies that advertise on it is questionable. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't think we'd still have to debate your first argument, but...the title of the article is the subject; pornography is a category. AVN is thus an independent source; where else would evidence of something winning their award be best found? (An album winning a Grammy would be found at grammy.com, wouldn't it?) Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 15:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability, fails CORP & GNG/ –Davey2010^Talk 19:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete very minor award, and no other sources for notability DGG ( talk ) 04:48, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not even a real studio, just a series of cookie-cutter videos with no indications of notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 18:37, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.