Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hibiki Ōtsuki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:52, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hibiki Ōtsuki

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks reliable sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. The article is cited to directory listings, industry promo materials, and otherwise unsuitable sources. The awards listed do not rise to the level of significant. Significant RS coverage not found. The ja.wiki article is equally unconvincing for suitability. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Apparently she was awarded the Best Actress from DMM.R18 in 2016, and DMM.com is the biggest porno portal in Japan. This is a famous award that is much-covered in Japan (no lack of sources on the jawiki for that claim). So based on that, I say Keep. 00:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Underbar dk (talk • contribs)
Keep per Underbar dk. --Gstree (talk) 18:35, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:19, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Her reception of the aforementioned DMM award was given individual coverage by Tokyo Sports, Nikkan Gendai, and Shūkan Playboy (the first two of these are among the top 25 largest newspapers in the world by circulation.) --Cckerberos (talk) 22:15, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I see good sources online, in addition to arguments above. 198.58.162.200 (talk) 01:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of notability and hasn't won any significent awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 17:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per Davey2010. Montanabw^(talk) 02:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For people rejecting her DMM, Adult Broadcasting Awards, and Pink Grand Prix awards as insignificant, what Japanese awards do you consider significant? --Cckerberos (talk) 17:01, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a clear lack of coverage in indepdent reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The three publications I linked to aren't independent or reliable? --Cckerberos (talk) 17:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cckerberos: you need to add your publications to the article to take effect. Can you please do that? --Gstree (talk) 20:40, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The cited coverage is flimsy and pretty generic, while the article itself includes no nontrivial RS biographical content. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 02:16, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.