Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hikaru Koto (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bishonen | talk 00:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hikaru Koto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks reliable secondary sources that discuss the topic directly and in detail. Significant RS coverage not found.

The 2006 closed as "no consensus" with arguments such as "680,000 Google hits" etc. WP:PORNBIO has been significantly tightened since then, and I believe it's a good time to revisit. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:40, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Probable Keep: Appears to meet PORNBIO#1, having won the Jury Grand Prize at the inaugural 2005 Adult Broadcasting Awards. If the claim of selling more than a million videos is correct, that suggests that ENTERTAINER#2 was met, and this suggests at least a weak ANYBIO#2 during her post-porn heyday (moribund channel now has 78 million views total, though current subscriber numbers aren't particularly special). ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 09:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Nomination seemed to take only old AfD discussions into account, not the current state and content of the article, which clearly passes WP:PORNBIO and others per Hydronium Hydroxide's observations. _dk (talk) 20:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Industry “awards” are handed out like cupcakes and no notable outside coverage. Montanabw^(talk) 02:57, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The awards mentioned are not enough to establish notability. Beyond this there is still a lack of sufficient indepdent, reliable sources to meet GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete technical sng passes ade worthless for a subject that clearly fails the gng and that is the best case here. The reality is the award isnt enough so there is no sng pass either. Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:54, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.