Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keisha Kane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 15:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keisha Kane

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable porn actress that fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Per other recent AFDs, UK Adult Film and Television Awards does not merit notability and besides the BBC Documentary mentioned in the article, which itself does not seem very notable, there is hardly any coverage of this individual The Legendary Ranger (talk) 00:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- fails PORNBIO and GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fails WP:PORNSTAR & WP:General Notability Guideline. –Davey2010^Talk 01:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing even close to crossing any notability guidelines for pornographic performers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:11, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom'a accurate arguments. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 18:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.