Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitsch (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ^Complex/_Rational 17:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kitsch (magazine)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 16:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Journalism, and Literature. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, with a little regret because this article has more "to" it than I'd expect given that this is a student magazine. Nonetheless, I can only find two secondary sources (both in the article itself, [1] and [2]) -- which are both also student publications, and questionably independent given that both are from universities whose students contribute to Kitsch. I don't see GNG coverage here. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 23:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.