Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Ryder (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Ryder

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously userfied as failed gng and lbio. Recreated but not sourced. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO and WP:GNG. The assertion that the subject "was an extremely well-known performer" was never supported by citations to reliable sources. The previous version of the article was in user space for two years waiting for better sourcing which never came. Independent searches for RS coverage get trivial mentions, nothing substantial. • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Gene93k, fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO - GretLomborg (talk) 05:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.