Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leilani Leeane (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leilani Leeane

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is a rising star award enough to overcome an utter lack of meeting the gng. Sngs are indications of likely notability and where the technical pass is in the case of someone clearly failing gng, the gng prevails. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:02, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no encyclopedically relevant prose and no sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. "Rising Star Female" is not a significant award. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:33, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my argument in the initial AFD. Should have been deleted then, but the closer inexplicably gave full weight to what other admins accurately described as "appalling bad faith" keep !votes. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 14:13, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.