Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewis Hilsenteger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 05:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis Hilsenteger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ill-sourced collection of assertions about allegedly famous YouTube "partner" who "trended" a hashtag about nothing much. Orange Mike | Talk 05:53, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 14:12, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The prospect of deleting his Wiki page is simply ridiculous, considering that he has nearly 2 million subscribers on his Youtube channel!

Delete As per rationale of nominator. Ill sourced is correct sir! (to dispel confusion, I did not write the line above starting with "The prospect of deleting") WordSeventeen (talk) 03:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please be aware that no number of subscribers — whether two or two million — confers a Wikipedia notability freebie on a person who isn't the subject of sufficient coverage in reliable sources to earn one the normal way. But that has failed to be demonstrated here — this relies heavily on primary and unreliable sources, with the few reliable ones not being substantively enough about him (he's quoted in a couple of articles about the iPhone, but fails to be the subject of any of them in a particularly substantive way), nor numerous enough in number, to confer notability under WP:GNG. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 01:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable. Suttungr (talk) 19:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.