Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxembourg horse
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 06:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Luxembourg horse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This has been copied from the Groningen horse article with the height changed, so I'm not sure of its accuracy. Google books search results suggest that there is (or was) a horse known as a Luxembourg horse, but the only fact available is that it "differs little from the French Ardennais", there's no information that it is a recognised breed. Peter James (talk) 20:18, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 01:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I can find no evidence that this is a notable topic. The article is unreferenced, and my search for reliable sources was unsuccessful. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:32, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - I found the journal mentioned by the nominator but nothing else. Can't see that there is enough to substantiate notability of this particular breed. Tellingly, there is a Encyclopedia of Horse Breeds but this particular one isn't listed. Stalwart111 06:44, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: as per above. -- Fauzan✆ talk ✉ email 13:21, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.