Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marylin Star

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Move _target(if any) should be discussed at talk page. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 06:14, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marylin Star

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blp1e for a crime that had a minimal sentence, otherwise fails pornbio so is a blp fail. All there is to write is negative stuff of an insignificant person. Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the main coverage is BLP1E ( one event) which was not a news item that is likely to be lasting coverage.Atlantic306 (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T/C) 20:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T/C) 20:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T/C) 20:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T/C) 20:59, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 16:36, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per sources found by Hullaballoo, Meets GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:14, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

*delete as non-notable criminal, non-nable actress. SIGCOV just isn't out there.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. With at least four articles in The New York Times over a two-year span, at least one directly centered on her, post-prison coverage in the New York Post, discussion in legal reference books, Time, U.S. News and more, I don't think there's much of a question that she satisifies the GNG. The article should probably be moved to Kathryn B. Gannon; she's better known under her real name, and the more recent/more substantive coverage, like this Times piece [1], doesn't even mention her porn stage name. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 18:47, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. The sources they mention along with others in the article satisfy GNG. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 08:14, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.