Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massimo Rizzoli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both. Agreement that neither person meets notability standards. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:32, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Massimo Rizzoli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable martial artist. Does not meet WP:KICK as a kickboxer or WP:GNG. Being the brother of Patrizio Rizzoli has no relevance via WP:NOTINHERITED and considering the latter is also of questionable notability. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason. Also founding and being head of non-notable martial arts or organizations does not equate notability. Does not meet notability criteria for mixed martial artists either.Peter Rehse (talk) 13:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Patrizio Rizzoli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Delete both Neither one has significant independent coverage to meet WP:GNG. As for being MMA "experts", they have a combined total of 1 win between them and no appearances in even a second tier promotion. The unsourced kickboxing claim, even if verified, would not meet WP:NKICK. There's nothing to show the martial art they founded is notable or meets WP:MANOTE. Mdtemp (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both. Neither gets anything in Google Newspapers. Both get a very little in Google News (some of it not RS) despite apparently having been doing what they do for many decades. What little they do get seems to be all very recent too. I'm not best placed to judge the quality of the hits as I am reading them in Google Translate but a lot are short articles or articles primarily about other people. Neither one has an article in Italian Wikipedia so we can't look for better references there. I can't see this being enough to keep either article. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:43, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
  NODES
Note 3
Project 1