- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep - expansion from jawiki is desirable, seeing as sources are apparently available there. A reminder that enwiki sources explicitly do not have to be in English. (non-admin closure) Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 13:39, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Matsuda clan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only source cited does not mention the clan at all, and a quick Google search doesn't show any sources. Squeeps10 Talk to meMy edits 04:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Squeeps10 Talk to meMy edits 04:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Squeeps10 Talk to meMy edits 04:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The topic is clearly notable. If you look at the ja.wiki article which is about twenty times longer, there are numerous reliable sources in Japanese. Mccapra (talk) 04:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The subject passes WP:GNG and its corresponding articles are written longer in other foreign languages. The issue is the article needs to be further expanded and needs more sources. Abishe (talk) 06:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.