Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monique (actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Monique (actress)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. "Freakiest Girl in Porn" is not a well-known/significant award, and Urban X/Spice awards generally fail PORNBIO regardless of category. Negligible biographical content, reliably sourced or otherwise. (NYTimes article does not even mention article subject). The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 02:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 05:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 05:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 05:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no sig RS coverage that discusses the topic directly and in detail. The massive list of nominations does not make up for the lack of sources. The one award listed is not significant and well known. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nominations and minor award win do not satisfy WP:PORNBIO. Notability is not inherited from "bestselling" video, especially without RS acknowledgment of a significant role. Lacks significant reliable source coverage needed to pass WP:GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.