Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natsuko Kayama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:11, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Natsuko Kayama

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another unsourced blp for a porn performer whose only claim to fame is an in house award that has been shown repeatedly not to confer notability. Blps deserve better than this. Fails gng and the discredited Pornbio. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:45, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No evidence of notability and hasn't won any significent awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG .–Davey2010^Talk 03:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. I can find nothing explaining what the "Weekly Popular" award is given for, but there's nothing supporting the argument that it meets the well-known and significant standard in the applicable SNGs. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 14:28, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable pornography actress.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:39, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.