Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natsumi Horiguchi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by Edgar181 per creator's request at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chika Eiro. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Natsumi Horiguchi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PORNBIO and the WP:GNG. No real assertion of notability. Adult Broadcating Awards are given by a broadcaster to promote its own programming, and therefore fail the well-known/significant test. Moreover, the "mature actress"/MILF category by consensus general fails that standard, regardless of the awardgiver; while appearing in a video which wins a porn award makes no more than a negligible contribution to notability.. No biographical content. No reliable sourcing beyond databases; the Tokyo Reporter describes itself as "scurrilous" and has been characterized as a "hybrid of the National Enquirer, the New York Post and Penthouse. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 01:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete blps require unshit sourcing, Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I just added that she's the main actress in a recent drama film named after her, Natsu Left Home. --Gstree (talk) 08:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

source? Notability? Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Spartaz: I added this work too the article before I mentioned it here. She worked with the director Hideo Jojo. --Gstree (talk) 18:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

how is the film notable? Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have pointed this out to the nominator several times, but the nominator's description of the award is wrong. The nominator has offered no evidence that the award is as he or she describes. As is described in this major news source [1], it is an award that covers nearly 10,000 programs that were carried on SkyPerfecTV. SkyPerfecTV is the main satellite broadcaster in Japan and it carries hundreds of channels which are operated by other companies (including Fox, BBC, etc.). The award does not cover "its own programming" but merely programs that the channels programmed. It would be the equivalent of DirecTV or Sky sponsoring an award for programs broadcast on HBO, AMC, or the BBC. I have no opinion yet on this individual actress, but I would ask the nominator to stop mischaracterizing the award or at least offer proof that my evidence is incorrect. Michitaro (talk) 02:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- What are you talking about? That source says that the award is given by Sky Perfect TV to "adult works broadcasted last year with "SKY PerfecTV!", which is Sky Perfect's own programming. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 00:36, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- yet another poorly sourced article by the same article creator. No indications of notability of importance. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Minor awards with no reliable sources, failing both PORNBIO and GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient indicia of notability. Montanabw^(talk) 08:30, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable pornography actress.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 16:44, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.