Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norma Stitz (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Clearly meets GNG and PORNBIO; no valid reason for deletion and therefore closing per WP:SK#1. (non-admin closure) KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 12:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Norma Stitz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently "Norma" has the largest breasts in the world. That's it. The last AfD was started in 2004. --Hillbillyholiday (talk) 01:18, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 August 23. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep No reason for deletion has been provided, unless breast size is considered an argument. Clearly has the necessary coverage to satisfy notability requirements. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 10:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.