Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Kramer Bussel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  B E C K Y S A Y L E 02:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Kramer Bussel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are not enough sources about Bussel to show that she is notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.[a]

Notes

  1. ^ A popular retort when asking for advice on the internet is "Search the Flaming Web" (STFW).[1] However, not everything on the web is a reliable source that can be used to prove notability of a topic.

Citations

  1. ^ "STFW". Jargon File. Retrieved 21 August 2016.
Unscintillating (talk) 01:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep  A Google Scholar snippet from AD Ross - Sexuality & Culture, 2012 - Springer states that the topic is, "...a sex writer who is particularly concerned with the question of female masochism. According to Bussel, being submissive is actually..."  Unscintillating (talk) 01:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
  NODES
admin 2
INTERN 1
Note 8
Project 2