Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxy DeVille

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:09, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Roxy DeVille

Roxy DeVille (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A biography of a living person that lacks reliable, independent sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Significant RS coverage cannot be found. Article is cited to industry publicity materials, social media, interviews, and other sources unsuitable for determining notability. The award listed is not significant and well known, with the award category -- Unsung Siren -- strongly suggesting that it's WP:TOOSOON for the subject to have an article. Article copy itself consists mostly of trivia, such as:

• She worked as a shampoo girl at a hair salon...
• In 2008, she stated that she wanted to own either a beauty salon or dive bar after retiring from porn. Etc.

References

Article was created in 2008 and quite possibly was meeting WP:PORNBIO then. The SNG was significantly tightened since then, and the article no longer meets it. Hence the AfD. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:39, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

• Delete per nom's accurate analysis. Closed thing to a legitimate claim of notability is a role as a naked extra ("Dante's Girl #4") in a Sex and the City film, and that falls far below even PORNBIO standards. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 17:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
• Delete - does not meet either GNG or PORNBIO. Fyddlestix (talk) 17:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
• Delete as non notable porno actress, hasn't won any significant/notable awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 16:27, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.