Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saya Misaki (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:57, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saya Misaki

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A biography that lacks reliable sources that discuss the topic directly and in detail. The article is cited to blogs, ecommerce web sites, directories, and other unsuitable sources.

The first AfD closed as "keep" in 2007 based on the argument that "35 DVDs at mainstream Amazon.com clearly indicate notability" and the overall notability of the genre, both of which are odd criteria to use. Ten years on, I believe it's a good time to revisit. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The number of DVDs that this person appeared in does not show that her work rises to the level of notability. She does not pass any applicable notability standard.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:31, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the previous AFD where editors provided in-depth coverage and policies. </sarcasm> (Obviously Delete per PORNBIO & GNG.) –Davey2010^Talk 17:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010: would you mind unbolding the "keep" vote and bolding the "delete" one? Otherwise, if a closer is looking at AfD tool, they may interpret that there's ambiguity. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. –Davey2010^Talk 15:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.