Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoko Goto (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested; see WP:SOFTDELETE. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shoko Goto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unremarkable adult actress; significant coverage that discuss the subject directly and in detail not found. The article has been a subject of several AfDs, with the most recent (2008) closing as "No consensus". Arguments for a "Keep" included "well known" and "has a lot of titles on Amazon". To accompany this, the current copy includes:

"In late 2010, more than six years after her debut, Japanese Amazon still listed 32 DVDs and two VHS tapes featuring her".

Sources used are either primary or not independent of the subject. The WP:PORNBIO guidelines have been significantly tightened since then, so I think it's a good time to revisit. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:25, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Barely survived multiple AFDs almost a decade ago when catering to breawt fetishists was considered strong evidence of notability, but fails today's rational standards. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 18:13, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.