Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spartak Tennis Club
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sources added, though some of them are trivial. Borderline case. PeaceNT 15:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Spartak Tennis Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
non-notable tennis-club. fails WP:CORP and no sources are cited. notability is not inherited from the people who trained or taken a crap in the bathrooms. Law/Disorder 22:34, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, if it trained all those famous players, it might have something written about it; but there's nothing given, so it fails the notability test. Nyttend 05:13, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I hadn't heard of it, and I thought it was a joke - this run down tennis court that is unused for half the year producing all those tennis stars. But a quick search showed that the place is well known and highly revered in the tennis community. I put in just three sources, but there are plenty more. And the Not Inherited doesn't apply to places which are sourced as being notable such as CBGB or Spartak Tennis Club, it applies to arguments used in AfD debates in which someone says "notability is not inherited from the people who trained or taken a crap in the bathrooms." And now that the article is sourced, it passes WP:CORP. SilkTork *SilkyTalk 00:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- keep per silkytalk. Witty Lama 15:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.