Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephnie de Ruyter
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-23 08:41Z
- Stephnie de Ruyter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not notable Randomkiwi 01:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC) This person isn't notable. Stood as a low-ranked candidate for a minor political party, with little likelihood of election.[reply]
- Comment it seems the NZ Dem party article would be included here, or else if that's notable enough, this person also probably is. I am not !voting here, because this subject is so far off my radar, I do not have a strong opinion on it. Jerry lavoie 02:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions. -- Eastmain 02:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Leaders of even minor parties are notable. --Eastmain 02:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Seems notable enough. The article has been around for a long while with no issues, and is linked to by a fair number of other pages. --Limegreen 03:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Eastmain.-gadfium 03:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as leader of an active party. Some sources: [1], [2], and [3]. -- Black Falcon 04:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. party leaders in parliamentary systems are important, even if they are not in parliament. semper fictilis 05:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Political leaders are useful to wikipedia considering they are not a Member Of Parliament. Czesc26
- Delete The Google UK search results were a bit inconclusive, therefore and in my opinion failing WP:BIO.TellyaddictEditor review! 13:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.