Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweet Sinner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 05:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Sinner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unremarkable film studio that lacks sources that discuss the topic directly and in detail. The article is cited to interviews, industry publicity materials and other sources not suitable for notability.

The award listed (Feminist Porn Award) is not significant and well known. Significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. The references are not independent and fail WP:RS -- HighKing⁺⁺ 20:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Completely lacking in independent reliable source coverage to satisfy WP:CORP. Supplied references are affiliated sources, press releases and blog posts. RS searches yield more republished press releases and other promotional announcements. • Gene93k (talk) 21:32, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No independent reliable sourcing. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.