Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swiss Thiss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SALT also. Secret ^account 06:49, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Swiss Thiss

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've declined a CSD A7, as the article's creator asserted it was one of the most popular online stores in Switzerland, but I cannot find any reliable sources that prove that this is the case. However, I think it's worth bringing it to AfD as there might be non-English sources that do establish notability after all. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here you see a TV Spot of the Shop - over 10 000 views. Should be popular enough . Regards http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thOlz-CeimM ) (Jimkio12 (talk) 15:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)).[reply]

Not only does that appear to be a self published source, it's not obvious that it's officially affiliated with the company that produced it, which means it's a copyright violation. Sorry, we can't use that. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP.- Article needs expansion not deletion. MilliTilli5 (talk) 07:21, 6 March 2013 (UTC) — MilliTilli5 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete. Advertising. I'm Swiss and I've never heard of thiss, er, this. No sources in the article, nothing (in any language) to be found on Google News. - clearly fails WP:GNG. Sandstein 16:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as blatant advertising CSD#G11. —gorgan_almighty (talk) 17:56, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not a great fan of Alexa ratings, but wouldn't "one of Switzerland most popular online Shops" be higher than #14,378 in its home territory? [1] AllyD (talk) 18:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence found (on Google, Highbeam, Questia) to indicate that this meets WP:NWEB or WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 18:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP. :: Alexa: switzerland is a small country. also its just working in der german speaking part of switzerland. so alexa shows me about 5000-10000 visits a month. not bad for such a small country. also you see 11 000 you tube views. its not the point if you use this commercial or not. but you can see many people watched it. so it seams it cant be that unpopular. for my opinion this is more then enough for a small article. (Jimkio12 (talk) 05:50, 6 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Google searches and numbers. Thanks. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:14, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KEEPKeep-sources are there. The subject is notable RinoMio1 (talk) 06:38, 6 March 2013 (UTC) — RinoMio1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Comment You say "sources are there"; where? This article about a website continues to be sourced only to the site itself. AllyD (talk) 07:58, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as per CSD#G11. Smirkingman (talk) 18:16, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per CSD#G11. Lacks sufficient coverage in reliable sources, thus notability is not established. --Cyrus Andiron 19:07, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.