Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom's Ice Cream Bowl

< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I don't see further discussion being likely to establish a consensus given the fundamental disagreement displayed here about whether or not current sources satisfy notability requirements. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tom's Ice Cream Bowl

edit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Tom's Ice Cream Bowl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CSD removed and now DEPRODed , fails clearly WP:NCORP and WP:GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @CommanderWaterford: Actually, for companies and organizations, local coverage is usable to establish notability, as long as that coverage is independent, significant, and from a reliable source, and provided that WP:AUD is met. Please note that WP:AUD is part of the Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) page, and states that "at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary". WP:AUD does not state that all of the sources must be at least regional (et al.), only that one of them needs to be. This is important because you come across as dismissing any sources that are local in nature, but as long as WP:AUD is satisfied with at least one non-local reliable source being available that provides independent, significant coverage, reliable local sources that provide said independent, significant coverage are usable to establish notability. North America1000 19:55, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So you'll be able to provide those sources? An appearance on the Food Network is not coverage. TAXIDICAE💰 16:42, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I did follow a before and found that the hyper local coverage is insufficient and just appearing in books is irrelevant unless the books are reliable themselves. Anyone can self publish a book and it's appearance in fiction is irrelevant unless it's the subject of actual coverage itself. If I write about my favorite corner store in my self-published fanfiction on Amazon, it doesn't make it notable. TAXIDICAE💰 18:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The 30 sources referenced show that this single shop has a following in the State of Ohio, around the USA (in national media), and even in Australia. Easily meets WP:GNG. Article is not what it was when nominated for deletion. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:21, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - first, being mentioned on a national tv show in and of itself does not necessarily equate with significant non-local coverage. Second, has anyone ever checked to see if this "national tv program" actually aired? Turns out it did, not on the Food Network, but on the Cooking Channel, and consisted of a 3 minute segment. This is hardly significant coverage. As such, fails WP:NCORP. Onel5969 TT me 14:28, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You've overlooked this. Today is national TV.
That you say that the food network's show didn't air is WP:OR. And is contradicted by "Tom's Ice Cream Bowl" (Video). Ice Cream Nation. The Cooking Channel. July 17, 2017 – via YouTube.
Given the present state of the article WP:HEY. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:39, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It doesn't pass WP:NCORP. The first five reference fail WP:ORGIND. A very small private business. Regarding the reference above, 2 comments above, it states in the profile, not a reference, It was a good PR move. Our name got out there all over the country. So most of these reference are PR and paid for news. I don't see a single source that doesn't fail WP:NCORP. scope_creepTalk 12:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Youtube video above has 7k. It might as well be invisible for the reach it has. If it has 700k views, fair enough. But it is not. scope_creepTalk 12:59, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per my earlier comments and Scope's. This might be locally popular, but so is my local corner store and several local restaurants, many of which were featured on full length episodes on The Food Network - however, none of them, including Tom's, have been the subject of non-trivial coverage. TAXIDICAE💰 13:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 10:18, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is a nice little article about a nice little spot in a nice little town, leave it alone. It is not advertising and a lot of editors have put work into it. In these troubled times Ohio needs all the good vibes it can get. Why not let this be a part of that? Carptrash (talk) 16:47, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per everyone else that voted deleted. Especially Scoop. Clearly this isn't notable outside of the local area and what small national coverage it did get was a PR thing more then anything else. Like Scoop says, if the Food Network segment had thousands of views and there hasn't been hundreds of other local corner stores and restaurants that were also featured on Food Network then maybe I'd vote keep based on that, but there's nothing to make this any more particularly notable then any of the others that have been featured on the network. Likely whatever coverage in other outlets it got were more a function of it being on a TV show then anything else to and notability isn't inherited. I think that's clear in the fact that 99% of the article about it are from after it was featured on the show or the whole Mitt Romney visit thing. It's not inherently notable just because a presidential candidate went there either BTW. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
    1. Wince, Lori (1998-07-25). "Zanesville ice cream shop named one of the best". Coshocton Tribune. Thomson News Service. Archived from the original on 2021-04-26. Retrieved 2021-04-26 – via Newspapers.com.

      The article notes that USA Today named Tom's Ice Cream Bowl in Zanesville as one of the best places for ice cream. It was founded in 1948 by Jack Hemmer and Tom Mirgon, two cousins. The ice cream shop relocated to McIntire Avenue in 1950. In 1984, the current owner Bill Sullivan purchased it.

    2. Kull, Hayden (2017-06-14). "Food Network to film at Tom's Ice Cream Bowl on Wednesday". Coshocton Tribune. Archived from the original on 2021-04-26. Retrieved 2021-04-26 – via Newspapers.com.

      The article notes that Tom's Ice Cream Bowl was founded by Tom Mirgon and was "named as the top place in the country to get ice cream by USA Today". The article further notes that the Food Network would be "filming a pilot for its new show 'Ice Cream Nation,' at Tom's Ice Cream Bowl Wednesday that will air on July 21."

    3. "Taste the Season". Ohio Magazine. Vol. 28, no. 14. Cleveland, Ohio: Great Lakes Publishing. March 2006. p. 75. ISSN 0279-3504.

      The abstract notes, "The article reports on the traditional services of the ice cream parlor Tom's Ice Cream Bowl in Zanesville, Ohio. The parlor creates homemade ice cream served in dishes that look like soup bowls. Furthermore, Tom's will be stocking springtime ice cream favorites that includes lime sherbet and lemon chip."

    4. "Roadside eats. (Sprayberry's Barbecue, Betos, Tom's Ice Cream Bowl) (Restaurant Review)". Country Living. Vol. 26, no. 3. March 2003. p. 64. ISSN 0732-2569.
    5. Matthews, Peggy (1992-03-25). "Tom's Ice Cream Bowl will not alter what has made it successful". Times Recorder. Archived from the original on 2021-04-26. Retrieved 2021-04-26 – via Newspapers.com.

      The article notes that Tom's Ice Cream Bowl was founded by the cousins Tim Mirgon and Jack Rammer and that "the restaurant gained its reputation because of generous portions of homemade ice cream served in generous sized bowls." The article noted that "Bill Sullivan, the current owner, pledged to never change the name". It was founded in 1948 on Linden Avenue. When it opened, it had four tables and a counter with four seats. It was named Jack Hemmer Ice Cream. After two years, the restaurant moved to 532 McIntire Ave. so it could have more space for customers. After Tom purchased Jack's stake, the restaurant was renamed to have Tom's Ice Cream Bowl in 1957. After Tom retired, Sullivan purchased the restaurant in 1984. Sullivan previously had been its manager.

    6. Rudloff, Jim. (1997-02-28). "Zanesville's favorite tradition" (pages 1, 2, and 3). Times Recorder. Archived from the original (pages 1, 2, and 3) on 2021-04-26  Retrieved 2021-04-26 – via Newspapers.com.

      This is an extensive three-page profile of Tom's Ice Cream Bowl.

    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Tom's Ice Cream Bowl to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    Cunard (talk) 11:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • The articles from Thomson News Service (national coverage), Country Living (national coverage), and Cleveland, Ohio-based Ohio Magazine (statewide coverage) allow Tom's Ice Cream Bowl to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Audience, which says:

    The source's audience must also be considered. Evidence of significant coverage by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability. On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary.

    The local newspaper Times Recorder has extensively profiled Tom's Ice Cream Bowl. Tom's Ice Cream Bowl has received sustained coverage over a period of several decades with sources published in 1992, 1997, 1998, 2003, 2006, and 2017.

    Cunard (talk) 11:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tom%27s_Ice_Cream_Bowl&oldid=1254693828"
  NODES
INTERN 3
Note 12
Project 1