Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracey Lain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tracey Lain

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unremarkable actress. Per recent AfDs, the awards listed (UK Adult Film and Television Awards & UK Adult Producers Awards) do not satisfy WP:PORNBIO. Sources provided include non RS directories and self-published material. Significant RS coverage cannot be found. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:23, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, apparently has won some "amateur" awards but not seeing where the article subject passes GNG. Kierzek (talk) 21:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as all of the awards are trivial and as is the information, none of this suggests anything meaningful for improvements or convincing overall. SwisterTwister talk 22:35, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete more or less per nom. All sources are essentially promotional or are unselective databases not supporting notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 10:32, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:28, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article seems promotional and I couldn't find anything with a simple google search. Fails wp:gng. seanhaley1 (talk) 23:40, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Suspicious account: Please note that the above contributor has recently created an account, rapidly made 10 edits and then started !voting on multiple AfDs, many of which don't make sense. See Special:Contributions/Seanhaley1 for their edits. There is a possibility that this is an undisclosed paid editor/canvassed editor/sockpuppet who is probably voting on multiple AfDs to hide the actual _target. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:52, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to UK Adult Film and Television Awards - The "Best Female Performer in an Amateur Film" Award was a minor award category at this "well-known" (within the United Kingdom at least) award ceremony. BTW, it appears that the "UK Adult Producers Awards" may be one in the same as the UKAFTAs. Guy1890 (talk) 06:10, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 15:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.