Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traci Topps (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Traci Topps

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PORNBIO and the WP:GNG. No qualifying awards. No nontrivial reliable sourcing (only reference is a trivial name-drop. No sourced biographical content. Survived an AFD a decade ago on the now-deprecated theory that willingness to show off one's surgically inflated breasts made a woman notable. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 03:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nominator's assessment is correct. Lacks non-trivial coverage by reliable sources. The 2006 "well-known pornstar" rationale for keeping does not cut it without RS support. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Hasn't won any significant awards, no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 03:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- no notability established nor found. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.