Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolf Hudson (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wolf Hudson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails gng. I cant see the awards being significant enough to meet pornbio but even if they were a technical sng pass should not be enough to keep an article that clearly fails gng, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:09, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- unremarkable adult actor; awards are not significant. Deleted in 2007, and has not improved since. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:52, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No Notable award wins. Finnegas (talk) 10:53, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.