Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenza Raggi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:46, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zenza Raggi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails gng and pornbio. Regional award surely isnt enough when gng is failed. Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Looking through the other language editions of Wikipedia yields various other claims that may prove notability. He apparently has an important part in Melancholie der Engel and fr:Zenza Raggi claims that he also played in Baise-moi (as "Karim Sabaheddine"). So he may be more notable than he looks. There is also a crime claim in the french Wikipedia that doesn't appear to be sourced very well. —Kusma (t·c) 20:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable porn actor, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 12:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet WP:ANYBIO; trivial coverage. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:37, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.