Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DarafshBot 2
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Denied.
Operator: درفش کاویانی (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 18:19, Thursday April 12, 2012 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: Standard pywikipedia
Function overview: add interwiki
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): daily
Estimated number of pages affected: 100
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): yes
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): yes
Function details: bot add and change interwiki with -autonomous parameter and JUST edit in -ns:0
Discussion
editim sorry, i dont understand my bot editing in en.wp. i delete en in my user-config. please trust me and my bot again. Best Regards Mamad TALK 18:19, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This bot appears to have edited since this BRFA was filed. Bots may not edit outside their own or their operator's userspace unless approved or approved for trial. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:08, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your bot is still editing. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 20:20, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Blocked. It should not be editing unapproved, I think that much is clear. - Jarry1250 [Deliberation needed] 20:56, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah i accept my wrong! and delete en in my user-config and it never edited. please open the bot and give me a chance again. Thanks Mamad TALK 23:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not approved for (any) editing on the English Wikipedia, and it will remain blocked (again, on the English Wikipedia) until it is, given the history of the account.
- Are we to take your message as an indication you would still like to seek approval for your bot to run here? - Jarry1250 [Deliberation needed] 10:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, i want to approval for my bot to run here. please unbloke my bot and give me approval for trial edits. Mamad TALK 18:30, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah i accept my wrong! and delete en in my user-config and it never edited. please open the bot and give me a chance again. Thanks Mamad TALK 23:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Right, final chance then. Approved for trial (10 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete.. - Jarry1250 [Deliberation needed] 08:48, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. i made 10 edits. Mamad TALK 11:22, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved for extended trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:25, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 50 edits done and i turn off my bot. Mamad TALK 23:22, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- What is this this edit again? — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 08:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- (COIBot shouldn't be spitting out en: rather than :en: links, come to mention it). But I agree with HK: the description clearly states article space only. That that condition could not be kept to does not inspire me with confidence, I have to say. - Jarry1250 [Deliberation needed] 08:26, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- What is this this edit again? — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 08:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 50 edits done and i turn off my bot. Mamad TALK 23:22, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- im confuced! i just run my bot in -ns:0 i can copy my crontab at here. Likely to i run bot on PC and forgot to type -ns:0, if just 1edit has wrong, i promise you I NEVER RUN MY BOT ON PC! Mamad TALK 10:43, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved for extended trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:25, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. i made 10 edits. Mamad TALK 11:22, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Stepping in, citing WP:COMPETENCE for the second time, Denied.. Josh Parris 23:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.