 | This guideline is a part of the English Wikipedia's Manual of Style. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though occasional exceptions may apply. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page. |
 | This page in a nutshell: An article should not contain a list of miscellaneous information. It is better to present things in an organized way. |
| Manual of Style (MoS) |
|---|
Avoid creating lists of miscellaneous information. It was once common practice on Wikipedia for articles to include lists of isolated information, which were often grouped into their own section. These sections were typically given names such as "Trivia", "Facts", "Miscellanea", "Other information" and "Notes" (not to be confused with "Notes" sections that store reference citation footnotes). For an example of this practice, see the John Lennon trivia section from December 10, 2005.
Collections of random facts should be avoided. Sometimes, such a list is found in regular prose; any list of examples should have a solid connection to the article subject, and even then the number of examples should be limited. If there are an abundance of possible examples, and none stand out as the most significant, it may be best to avoid such a list entirely. A list of arbitrary points or examples risks becoming a trivia magnet, which grows increasingly unwieldy as things are added on.
If such a list already exists, it should be considered temporary, until editors can sort out what is worth keeping. Content supported by a reliable source and within the scope of Wikipedia could be integrated into a different section or article. Non-encyclopedic content should be removed. Otherwise valid content should ultimately be removed if there isn't a good place for it.
Not all list sections are trivia sections
editIn this guideline, the term "trivia section" refers to a section's content, not its name. A trivia section is one that contains a disorganized and "unselective" list. However, a selectively populated list with a relatively narrow theme is not necessarily trivia, and can be the best way to present some types of information. For example, 1257 Samalas eruption contains a list of climate effects which that volcano eruption is believed to have had in different areas.
Other policies apply
editTrivia sections found in places such as IMDb sometimes contain speculation, rumor, invented "facts", or even libel. However, Wikipedia articles must not contain those, in a trivia section or anywhere else. Sensational claims not supported by a valid source may be removed immediately, even if the section remains in place.
"In popular culture" and "Cultural references" material
editCultural references about a subject should not be included simply because they exist. A Wikipedia article should summarize the subject's coverage in reliable secondary or tertiary sources which cover the subject's cultural impact in some depth. Avoid using sources which merely mention the subject's appearance in a movie, song, video game, television show, or other cultural item.
Cultural references are sometimes grouped into a section labelled "in popular culture", "in the media", "cultural references", "in fiction", etc. In other cases, such a list is included in regular prose. For example, all the film and television references to or reenactments of something. When not effectively curated, such a list can attract trivial references or otherwise expand in ways not compatible with Wikipedia policies such as what Wikipedia is not and neutral point of view.
As with most article content, prose is usually preferable to a list format, regardless of where the material appears. Such prose might give a logically presented overview (chronological and/or by medium) of how the subject has been documented, featured, and portrayed in different media and genres, for various purposes and audiences.
Take for example the subject of bone broth. You may wish to include mention of how Baby Yoda in The Mandalorian drank bone broth. An appropriate source might be Bon Appetit magazine, which is a reliable source for articles about soup. If Bon Appetit mentions how Baby Yoda drank bone broth, it may be suitable for inclusion in the bone broth article. By contrast, an article in Polygon reviewing the latest episode of The Mandalorian which does not go into any detail about bone broth but simply mentions that Baby Yoda drank some in that episode is not sufficient to include in the article because it does not provide any in-depth coverage of the subject of the article.
This sourcing requirement is a minimum threshold for inclusion of cultural references. Consensus at the article level can determine whether particular references which meet this criteria should be included.
Other guidance: See WP:No original research for why and how to avoid engaging in your own novel analysis of this coverage. See WP:Verifiability and WP:Identifying reliable sources for referencing standards. See WP:Neutral point of view for principles to apply in balancing Wikipedia treatment of cultural references to the subject.
See also
edit- Wikipedia:Handling trivia
- WP:IINFO – Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information (a Wikipedia policy)
- WP:"In popular culture" content (an essay)
- Category:Articles with trivia sections
- Template:In popular culture
- Template:Trivia
- List of Wikipedia articles with trivia sections
- Wikipedia:Fancruft
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Fandom
- Wikipedia:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia?
Handling miscellaneous information | |
|---|---|
| Policies and guidelines | |
| Essays | |
| WikiProjects | |
| About essays | |
