Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:ThePornDude

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ThePornDude

Submission declined 5 times. Notability being established is highly unlikely. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:57, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete pretty clearly a non-notable company. Fails GMG and ORG. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, couldn't find sufficient good sources when I reviewed the article or when the creator asked in IRC (multiple times). --AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 02:39, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:57, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NWEB without significant coverage by multiple independent reliable sources. No strong claim of notability as an organization. • Gene93k (talk) 20:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.