Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dalekusa

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Dalekusa

FINAL (2/2/2); withdrawn per WP:SNOW by EVula at 19:22, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dalekusa (talk · contribs) - Dalekusa has only been a member for a few months, but uses Twinkle, and is a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit. This user is fighting vandalism one article at a time. Dalekusa 16:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: I intend to delete articles when needed, participate in deletion reviews and AfD's, and block vandals.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: My fighting agianst vandalism (Warnings and reverts.) . They help Wikipedia, and prevent future problems.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: No, I have not. If I do, I will follow the dispute resolution process.

General comments

See Dalekusa's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

Links for Dalekusa: Dalekusa (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Dalekusa before commenting.

Discussion

Suggest withdrawal per WP:SNOW. Sorry, but I don't see this passing. You might also want to get adopted by another user. J-ſtan^Talk_Contribs 16:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Weak Support I feel this user deserves a chance. Dustihowe (talk) 18:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very, very, very, very weak, no SERIOUSLY really really weak, support Keepscases (talk) 19:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Oppose with regrets and suggest you withdraw before this is closed per WP:SNOW. You really need more experience. Get involved in some projects, try some more article-writing and get adopted. when you're ready, try an editor review first Keep up the good work! Majoreditor (talk) 17:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. More experience is needed. It takes time to gain the community's trust, closer to six months than three. Plus it's a rare event that an editor be sysopped with fewer than 2000 edits. Your work so far is good, but we'll have to see more of it. You're doing some work in all the right places. I recommend following the advice Majoreditor says above, and would like to add taking a look over this list of policies to make sure you get a good handle on everything. Useight (talk) 17:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

Neutral Non-Byte the Newbie Neutral. I concur, you should withdraw your nomination. 3 months and less than 150 edits is nowhere nearly enough edits to warrant adminship.Balloonman (talk) 18:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Ditto what Balloonman said, it seems your heart is in the right place but try and get some experience under your belt. The more edits you make, the better chance you have of running into different situations where you can learn more about Wikipedia policies and what to do in certain situations. Good luck!
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 18:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.