Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Statistics 2011

Requests by contributors for arbitration by year on Wikipedia.

This page presents arbitration data and statistics for 2011. For other years see:

• 2011 statistics
• 2010 statistics
• 2009 statistics
• 2008 statistics

Requests

• Legend: A=Accept, D=Decline, R=Recuse, C=Comment, I=Inactive/away, N=Not eligible.

Case requests

• Requests: 59; average duration: 6.7 days; accepted: 13 (22%); declined: 35 (59%); disposed by motion: 3 (5%); withdrawn: 4 (7%); removed: 4 (7%).

Involving 2011 arbs only

Case requests involving 2011 arbs only

Request	Opened	Closed	Days	Disp	A	D	R	C	I	Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Scientific realism article	20:54, 1-Dec-2011	07:11, 2-Dec-2011	0	Withdrawn	0	3	0	0	1	D		I				N	D								N	D
ARBPIA 3	13:49, 23-Nov-2011	15:18, 1-Dec-2011	8	Declined	0	5	2	2	1	D		I		D		N	C	D			R	R	C	D	N	D
Removal and Deletion of Images and Related Issues	05:03, 27-Nov-2011	01:44, 1-Dec-2011	4	Declined	0	6	0	0	1			I			D	N	D	D			D			D	N	D
Unblocks and enabling	08:04, 2-Nov-2011	05:42, 26-Nov-2011	24	Declined	6	7	0	0	1	D		I	A	D	D	N	A	A		A	D	D	D	D	N	A	A
Russavia, Biophys, etc.	17:45, 9-Nov-2011	18:55, 22-Nov-2011	13	Declined	0	5	0	3	1	D		I		C		N	D				D	C	D		N	D	C
Rich Farmbrough	09:18, 8-Nov-2011	12:06, 17-Nov-2011	9	Declined	7	5	2	0	1	A	R	I	A	A	A	N	A	D	D	D		A	A	D	N	D	R
Controversial images, NOTCENSORED, and Foundation principles	02:44, 24-Oct-2011	20:59, 26-Oct-2011	3	Declined	0	6	0	2	2	D			D		D	I	D	C			C	D			N	D	I
Azerbaijan-Armenia-Iran-Turkey	09:19, 10-Oct-2011	15:43, 15-Oct-2011	5	Declined	0	7	1	1	2				D	C		I	D	R			D	D	D	D	N	D	I
WikiProject: Conservatism	17:27, 7-Oct-2011	11:50, 11-Oct-2011	4	Declined	0	8	0	0	1	D	D				D	I	D	D			D		D		N	D
User:La goutte de pluie	21:56, 13-Sep-2011	00:21, 14-Sep-2011	0	Withdrawn	0	0	0	2	1							I							C		N		C
La goutte de pluie	22:10, 2-Sep-2011	12:17, 13-Sep-2011	11	Declined	2	5	0	2	1				A	D	C	I	D	D				D	D		N	A	C
Astroturfing on Singaporean politics	01:22, 24-Aug-2011	19:25, 2-Sep-2011	10	Declined	1	3	0	2	1						A	I	D	D			C		C		N		D
NYyankees51	08:42, 15-Aug-2011	09:29, 22-Aug-2011	7	Declined	0	7	0	3	2	C	I		C	D	C	I	D	D			D	D			N	D	D
Senkaku Islands	09:39, 13-Aug-2011	14:41, 17-Aug-2011	4	Accepted	8	0	1	1	3	A	I	I	A	C	R	I	A	A			A	A			N	A	A
Abortion	02:13, 3-Aug-2011	04:56, 12-Aug-2011	9	Accepted	5	1	3	2	1	C	R		A		A	I	A	D		A	C	A	R		N		R
User:Δ	15:39, 16-Jul-2011	12:51, 4-Aug-2011	19	Declined	2	8	1	2	1	C	D	C		D		I	A	R	D		D	D	A	D	N	D	D
Illicit Drug Interventions	03:46, 27-Jul-2011	14:42, 3-Aug-2011	7	Declined	1	7	0	0	3				D		D	I	D	A		D	D	D	I		N	I	D
Cults	06:19, 5-Jul-2011	23:02, 2-Aug-2011	29	Motion	7	1	2	5	1	A	A	D	R	A	C	I	A	A		A	C	R	C	A	N	C	C
Barbara Boxer Comments Re: Title	13:08, 26-Jul-2011	18:36, 29-Jul-2011	3	Removed	0	6	0	0	3	D					D	I	D				D		I	D	N	I	D
Alliance Peru Bolivia 1873	14:18, 15-Jul-2011	11:04, 20-Jul-2011	5	Declined	0	8	0	0	3	D				D		I	D		D	D	D	D	I		N	I	D
Nabla	01:05, 20-Jun-2011	13:41, 27-Jun-2011	8	Motion	0	1	0	8	1		I			C	C	C		D	C		C				C	C	C
Unblock of an indefinite block for Single-Purpose Account without any warning	21:51, 23-Jun-2011	04:25, 25-Jun-2011	1	Declined	0	9	0	0	1	D	I		D	D	D		D				D		D		D		D
Political activism	14:38, 12-Jun-2011	14:30, 19-Jun-2011	7	Declined	5	7	2	1	1	D	I		R	D	D	A	A	R	A	D	A	D	C	D	D	A
Big Red Movie Article	14:38, 12-Jun-2011	23:44, 15-Jun-2011	3	Removed	0	0	0	0	2		I									I
Arms of Bagrotioni	21:40, 12-Jun-2011	11:15, 15-Jun-2011	3	Declined	0	10	0	2	2	D	I		D	D	D		D	D	D	I	D		C		C	D	D
MickMacNee	04:31, 13-Jun-2011	11:06, 14-Jun-2011	1	Accepted	10	0	1	0	2	A	I		A		A	R	A	A	A	I	A	A			A	A
International Space Station	02:18, 10-Jun-2011	06:59, 13-Jun-2011	3	Declined	0	10	0	0	2	D	I		D	D		D	D	D		I	D		D		D	D
Falkland Islands and related articles	20:45, 31-May-2011	08:05, 9-Jun-2011	8	Declined	0	10	0	0	2	D	I			D		D	D	D		I	D	D	D			D	D
Mindbunny's comments on biographies of living persons	20:28, 22-May-2011	03:14, 1-Jun-2011	9	Declined	0	11	0	0	1	D	I			D	D	D		D	D	D	D	D		D	D
Angel670	17:32, 28-May-2011	04:11, 31-May-2011	2	Withdrawn	0	6	1	1	2	D	I			D		D	D	R		I	C		D			D
BLP and flagged revisions	18:45, 21-May-2011	22:10, 27-May-2011	6	Declined	5	7	1	0	3	A	I		D	D	A	D	A	D	D	I	R	A	D	D		A	I
Franklin child prostitution ring allegations	17:40, 6-May-2011	20:01, 21-May-2011	15	Declined	2	9	0	0	3	D	I	A	D	D		D	D	D		I	D	D		A		D	I
Hyphens and dashes	11:48, 5-May-2011	21:19, 16-May-2011	11	Motion	1	1	1	6	3	C	I			D	C	C	A	R		I	C			C		C	I
Racepacket	18:10, 26-Apr-2011	06:40, 30-Apr-2011	4	Accepted	7	0	3	0	3	A	I				A		A	R	R	I	R	A	A		A	A	I
Tree shaping	19:27, 25-Apr-2011	10:15, 28-Apr-2011	3	Accepted	9	0	0	0	3	A	I			A	A		A	A	A	I	A	A				A	I
Lyndon LaRouche 3	06:55, 21-Apr-2011	11:13, 26-Apr-2011	5	Declined	0	6	1	2	2	D	I			D	I		C	D	R		D	D				D	C
Racepacket	04:04, 10-Apr-2011	04:29, 20-Apr-2011	10	Declined	0	4	3	2	2		I			D	I	R	D	R	R		C	D		C		D
Lifting the Indian history topic ban	15:37, 10-Apr-2011	12:30, 16-Apr-2011	6	Declined	0	8	1	0	2		I			D	I	R	D	D	D		D	D		D		D
Ashot Arzumanyan	08:47, 7-Apr-2011	10:28, 11-Apr-2011	4	Declined	0	8	1	0	1	D	I			D			D	R	D		D	D		D		D
Jagged 85 RFC/U and cleanup	02:03, 21-Mar-2011	20:02, 31-Mar-2011	11	Declined	1	6	2	1	2	A	I			D	R	I	C	R	D		D	D	D			D
MzMcBride 3	22:09, 29-Mar-2011	16:46, 30-Mar-2011	1	Declined	0	9	0	0	2	D	I				D	D	D	D			D	D	D		D	I
Noleander	03:25, 29-Mar-2011	15:26, 30-Mar-2011	2	Accepted	11	0	0	1	1	A	I	A			A	A	A	A	A		A	A	A	A		C
Duke53	07:48, 16-Mar-2011	13:41, 22-Mar-2011	6	Withdrawn	2	5	1	2	3	C	I				A	I	D	A	D	D	D	R	D	C		I
Henri Coanda defamation - second try	17:42, 18-Mar-2011	08:09, 22-Mar-2011	4	Accepted	11	0	0	0	3	A	I			A	A	I	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A		I
Disruption at The Beatles article and talkpage	21:38, 14-Mar-2011	11:54, 19-Mar-2011	5	Declined	0	8	0	1	3	D	I		D	D	D	I	D	D	D		C		D			I
Dreadstar	05:57, 9-Mar-2011	01:23, 12-Mar-2011	3	Accepted	12	1	0	0	1	A			A		A	I	A	D	A		A	A	A	A	A	A	A
Ebionites 2	01:11, 28-Feb-2011	13:51, 8-Mar-2011	9	Accepted	10	0	1	1	1	A			A		A	I	A	A	A		A	R	I	A	A	A	C
Rodhullandemu	00:37, 2-Mar-2011	04:19, 7-Mar-2011	5	Accepted	12	1	2	1	1	A		R	A	A	R	I	A	A	A	A	D	A	C	A	A	A	A
Tuluva people	16:51, 14-Feb-2011	18:46, 24-Feb-2011	10	Declined	0	11	0	0	1	D				D	D	I	D	D	D		D	D	D			D	D
Henri Coanda defamation	21:53, 9-Feb-2011	18:44, 24-Feb-2011	15	Declined	4	7	1	1	0	C	R			D	D		D	A	A	A	D	D	D	A		D
Monty Hall problem	06:34, 9-Feb-2011	02:13, 12-Feb-2011	3	Accepted	14	0	0	0	0	A	A			A			A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A
Kehrli 2	18:50, 9-Feb-2011	15:08, 11-Feb-2011	2	Accepted	12	0	0	0	0	A				A			A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A
DMSBel appeal of topic ban	23:34, 25-Jan-2011	15:43, 3-Feb-2011	9	Declined	2	7	0	3	0		A		D	D	C		C	D			A	D	C	D		D	D
Envision EMI, LLC	06:03, 22-Jan-2011	15:44, 24-Jan-2011	2	Removed	0	6	0	0	0					D		D	D				D					D	D
Andrei nacu	00:20, 17-Jan-2011	01:32, 24-Jan-2011	7	Declined	0	9	1	1	0	D				D	D	D				D	D	D	D		D	C	R
Shakespeare authorship question	23:11, 14-Jan-2011	15:02, 16-Jan-2011	2	Accepted	11	0	1	1	0	A				A	A		A	A		A	A	R	A	C	A	A	A
O Fenian	01:41, 7-Jan-2011	22:30, 15-Jan-2011	9	Declined	0	10	1	0	0	D				D			D	D		D	D	D		D	D	R	D
Multiple Accounts	20:43, 7-Jan-2011	05:42, 9-Jan-2011	1	Removed	0	0	0	1	0												C
8mm caliber: 7.92mm calibre designation	09:43, 29-Dec-2010	19:40, 2-Jan-2011	4	Declined	0	6	0	0	0	D												D	D	D	D	D
Requests: 59; average duration: 6.7 days; accepted: 13 (22%); declined: 35 (59%); disposed by motion: 3 (5%); withdrawn: 4 (7%); removed: 4 (7%)

Involving 2011 and departing 2010 arbs

Case requests involving 2011 and departing 2010 arbs

Request	Opened	Closed	Days	Disp	A	D	R	C	I	Car	Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Fas	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Kni	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Requests: 0

Clarifications and other requests

• Requests: 60; average duration: 19.1 days; declined: 12 (20%); disposed by clarification: 27 (45%); disposed by motion: 19 (32%); withdrawn: 2 (3%); removed: 0 (0%).

Involving 2011 arbs only

Clarifications and other requests involving 2011 arbs only

Request	Opened	Closed	Days	Disp	R	C	I	Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Clarify : Abortion	03:48, 1-Dec-2011	11:55, 6-Dec-2011	5	Motion	3	6	1	C	R	I	C	C		N	C				C		R	C	N		R
Clarify ArbCom-unblocked editors	08:12, 8-Oct-2011	13:29, 29-Nov-2011	52	Clarification	0	9	1			I	C	C		N	C	C			C	C	C	C	N	C
Clarify : Eastern European mailing list	02:26, 28-Oct-2011	13:07, 29-Nov-2011	32	Clarification	1	3	1			I	C			N					C			R	N	C
Amend : Climate change	15:32, 28-Oct-2011	12:45, 17-Nov-2011	20	Motion	0	3	1			I				N			C		C		C		N
Clarify Δ	17:16, 26-Oct-2011	00:30, 3-Nov-2011	7	Motion	0	4	2	C						I					C		C		N	C	I
Amend : Digwuren	05:39, 9-Oct-2011	04:00, 31-Oct-2011	22	Declined	0	6	2				C			I		C			C	C	C		N	C	I
Amend : Climate change	20:37, 29-Sep-2011	21:38, 26-Oct-2011	27	Motion	0	10	2		C		C	C		I	C	C	C		C	C	C		N	C	I
Clarify : Digwuren	21:00, 15-Sep-2011	19:14, 3-Oct-2011	18	Clarification	0	7	1		C		C			I	C		C			C			N	C	C
Clarify : Ireland article names	12:37, 21-Sep-2011	17:24, 3-Oct-2011	12	Clarification	0	5	1							I	C	C	C		C				N		C
Amend : Russavia-Biophys	18:15, 1-Sep-2011	21:02, 29-Sep-2011	28	Declined	0	5	1							I	C		C		C				N	C	C
Clarify : Palestine-Israel articles	05:52, 15-Sep-2011	17:11, 25-Sep-2011	10	Clarification	0	7	1	C			C	C		I	C		C			C			N	C
Clarify : Ireland article names	19:53, 19-Aug-2011	15:15, 20-Sep-2011	32	Clarification	0	7	1				C	C		I	C				C	C			N	C	C
Amend : Race and intelligence	18:47, 3-Sep-2011	16:29, 18-Sep-2011	15	Declined	0	6	1			C	C			I	C				C			C	N		C
Clarify : Digwuren	21:03, 24-Aug-2011	03:31, 18-Sep-2011	24	Clarification	0	4	1							I	C					C			N	C	C
Clarify : Transcendental Meditation movement	19:53, 26-Aug-2011	12:51, 12-Sep-2011	17	Clarification	0	7	1	C			C			I	C				C		C		N	C	C
Clarify : Transcendental Meditation movement	19:53, 26-Aug-2011	12:51, 12-Sep-2011	17	Clarification	0	6	1	C			C			I	C				C				N	C	C
Amend : Date delinking	06:31, 5-Aug-2011	16:57, 9-Sep-2011	35	Motion	0	5	1					C		I	C						C		N	C	C
Amend : Ryulong	02:17, 16-Aug-2011	18:55, 1-Sep-2011	17	Declined	0	7	1		C		C	C		I	C						C		N	C	C
Clarify : Tree shaping	05:00, 23-Aug-2011	18:56, 1-Sep-2011	10	Clarification	0	4	1					C	C	I	C						C		N
Clarify : Race and intelligence	21:30, 9-Aug-2011	12:20, 15-Aug-2011	6	Withdrawn	0	2	1							I									N	C	C
Amend : Palestine-Israel articles	18:01, 18-Jun-2011	15:36, 9-Aug-2011	52	Motion	0	5	1	C				C		I	C	C							N		C
Clarify : Russavia-Biophys	14:07, 25-Jun-2011	16:30, 5-Aug-2011	41	Clarification	0	5	2	C				C		I						C	I		N	C	C
Clarify : Race and intelligence	10:41, 12-Jul-2011	16:23, 5-Aug-2011	24	Clarification	0	5	3	C		C		C		I					C		I		N	I	C
Amend : West Bank - Judea and Samaria	18:01, 18-Jun-2011	17:31, 21-Jul-2011	33	Motion	0	4	3		C			C		I	C						I		N	I	C
Clarify : World War II	17:08, 25-Jun-2011	19:59, 10-Jul-2011	15	Clarification	1	8	2		I		C	C		I	C				C		C	R	C	C	C
Amend Mbz1 block log	15:35, 24-Jun-2011	16:32, 10-Jul-2011	16	Declined	0	5	3	C	I		C			I	C						I		C	C
Amend : Eastern European mailing list	15:19, 17-Jun-2011	00:55, 5-Jul-2011	17	Motion	0	5	2		I					I	C				C				C	C	C
Clarify suspension of Thekohser community ban	23:06, 21-Jun-2011	17:19, 27-Jun-2011	6	Clarification	0	6	1	C	I		C	C									C			C	C
Clarify 195.82.106.244	15:09, 23-Jun-2011	17:11, 27-Jun-2011	4	Clarification	0	3	1		I			C							C						C
Amend : Ed Poor 2	17:59, 1-Jun-2011	19:54, 25-Jun-2011	24	Motion	0	5	1	C	I		C	C							C					C
Clarify : Kosovo	14:42, 7-Jun-2011	14:07, 20-Jun-2011	13	Clarification	0	6	1		I		C	C							C		C			C	C
Amend : Macedonia 2	15:50, 3-Jun-2011	16:45, 19-Jun-2011	16	Motion	0	5	1		I		C						C		C					C	C
Amend : Russavia-Biophys	14:00, 22-May-2011	15:14, 19-Jun-2011	28	Motion	0	8	1		I		C	C			C	C			C	C				C	C
Amend : Palestine-Israel articles	04:49, 14-Jun-2011	14:35, 19-Jun-2011	5	Declined	0	5	2		I						C			I		C	C		C	C
Clarify : Jack Merridew ban review motion	12:08, 7-May-2011	22:49, 4-Jun-2011	28	Motion	2	7	2	R	I		C			C		R	C	I	C	C		C		C
Clarify preliminary injunctions	15:57, 22-May-2011	22:11, 27-May-2011	5	Clarification	0	4	3	C	I		C					C		I		C					I
Amend : Pseudoscience	20:27, 5-May-2011	16:48, 21-May-2011	16	Declined	0	4	3		I							C		I	C	C				C	I
Amend : Transcendental Meditation movement	07:28, 24-Apr-2011	12:44, 9-May-2011	15	Declined	0	7	3	C	I			C			C			I		C	C		C	C	I
Amend : Russavia-Biophys	19:05, 21-Apr-2011	15:00, 6-May-2011	15	Motion	0	9	2	C	I			C			C			I	C	C	C	C		C	C
Clarify : Noleander	13:20, 27-Apr-2011	19:24, 5-May-2011	8	Clarification	0	2	3		I									I		C		C			I
Amend : Abd-William M. Connolley	20:25, 28-Apr-2011	07:38, 2-May-2011	3	Declined	0	8	3	C	I		C				C			I	C	C	C	C		C	I
Clarify : Longevity	22:33, 12-Apr-2011	04:28, 20-Apr-2011	7	Clarification	0	4	2		I				I		C				C	C				C
Clarify : Palestine-Israel articles	19:04, 5-Apr-2011	23:21, 17-Apr-2011	12	Clarification	0	5	2		I				I		C				C	C				C	C
Clarify : Race and intelligence	21:16, 5-Apr-2011	11:31, 15-Apr-2011	10	Motion	0	4	2		I				I		C				C			C		C
Amend : Date delinking	12:54, 25-Feb-2011	11:13, 5-Apr-2011	39	Declined	0	8	1		I	C			C		C				C	C	C		C		C
Amend : Race and intelligence	05:58, 6-Feb-2011	19:58, 24-Feb-2011	19	Declined	0	9	1	C	C			C		I	C				C	C	C	C		C
Amend : Jack Merridew ban review motion	01:32, 21-Feb-2011	19:33, 24-Feb-2011	4	Withdrawn	2	4	1	R			C		C	I		R					C				C
Amend : Date delinking	11:00, 29-Jan-2011	15:18, 8-Feb-2011	10	Motion	1	5	0	R							C				C	C	C		C
Amend : Date delinking	09:35, 1-Feb-2011	15:17, 8-Feb-2011	7	Motion	1	6	0	R					C		C				C	C	C		C
Amend : Eastern European mailing list	21:27, 4-Jan-2011	09:41, 4-Feb-2011	31	Motion	0	5	0		C										C	C				C	C
Clarify : Climate change	21:03, 18-Jan-2011	15:41, 3-Feb-2011	16	Clarification	0	6	0	C							C				C	C	C	C
Clarify : Speed of light	01:35, 23-Jan-2011	02:35, 2-Feb-2011	10	Clarification	0	5	0				C								C	C				C	C
Clarify User: Marknutley	18:37, 13-Jan-2011	04:36, 23-Jan-2011	9	Clarification	0	2	0																C		C
Clarify : Jack Merridew ban review motion	01:03, 8-Jan-2011	04:34, 23-Jan-2011	15	Clarification	2	5	0	R			C				C	R			C			C	C
Clarify : Macedonia	20:05, 3-Jan-2011	04:23, 23-Jan-2011	19	Clarification	0	5	0	C								C			C				C		C
Requests: 55; average duration: 18.1 days; declined: 11 (20%); disposed by clarification: 25 (45%); disposed by motion: 17 (31%); withdrawn: 2 (4%); removed: 0 (0%)

Involving 2011 and departing 2010 arbs

Clarifications and other requests involving 2011 and departing 2010 arbs

Request	Opened	Closed	Days	Disp	R	C	I	Car	Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Fas	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Kni	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Clarify : Climate change	20:55, 24-Dec-2010	04:28, 23-Jan-2011	29	Clarification	0	6	1	C				C			I		C					C	C			C	C
Amend : User:Koavf Community sanction	03:18, 30-Nov-2010	05:16, 10-Jan-2011	41	Motion	0	4	1	C							I							C	C	C		C
Amend : West Bank - Judea and Samaria	02:35, 14-Dec-2010	18:43, 6-Jan-2011	24	Motion	0	4	1	C							I									C		C	C
Amend : Pseudoscience	16:58, 6-Dec-2010	05:49, 6-Jan-2011	31	Declined	0	8	1	C	C			C			I							C	C	C		C		C
Clarify : Badlydrawnjeff	01:49, 15-Dec-2010	05:48, 6-Jan-2011	22	Clarification	0	6	1	C			C	C			I							C				C	C
Requests: 5; average duration: 29.4 days; declined: 1 (20%); disposed by clarification: 2 (40%); disposed by motion: 2 (40%); withdrawn: 0 (0%); removed: 0 (0%)

Arb activity

Legend

The following two tables each contain three sections, the first covering case requests, the second other requests and the third all requests. The column headings have the following meanings:

• ER (eligible requests): Indicates the beginning of a new section and gives the total number respectively, of case requests, other requests, or all requests, for which this arb was eligible to act (count of non-"N"s).
• I (inactive): The total number of requests for which this arb was listed at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee as inactive/away at the time of the request's closing, and did not act on the request (i.e. did not recuse. accept, decline or comment) (count of "I"s); as a percentage of ER.
• R (recused): The total number of requests for which this arb recused (count of "R"s); as a percentage of (ER − I).
• V (voted): The total number of case requests this arb voted to accept or decline (count of "A"s or "D"s); as a percentage of (ER − (I + R)).
• DNA (did not act): The total number of requests for which this arb was listed at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee as active at the time of the request's closing, but did not act (count of empty cells); as a percentage of (ER − (I + R)).
• A (accept): The total number of case requests this arb voted to accept (count of "A"s); as a percentage of V.
• D (decline): The total number of case requests this arb voted to decline (count of "D"s); as a percentage of V.
• C (comment): The total number of other requests this arb commented on (count of "C"s); as a percentage of (ER − (I + R)).

Arb activity (2011)

Arb activity (2011) — requests

Arb	ER	I	%	R	%	V	%	DNA	%	A	%	D	%	ER	I	%	R	%	C	%	DNA	%	ER	I	%	R	%	DNA	%
Casliber	59	0	0%	0	0%	40	68%	13	22%	16	40%	24	60%	60	0	0%	5	8%	19	35%	36	65%	119	0	0%	5	4%	49	43%
Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry	59	27	46%	3	9%	5	17%	24	83%	3	60%	2	40%	60	21	35%	1	3%	6	16%	32	84%	119	48	40%	4	6%	56	84%
Cool Hand Luke	59	7	12%	1	2%	3	6%	47	92%	2	67%	1	33%	60	4	7%	0	0%	4	7%	52	93%	119	11	9%	1	1%	99	93%
Coren	59	0	0%	2	3%	19	33%	37	65%	9	47%	10	53%	60	0	0%	0	0%	28	47%	32	53%	119	0	0%	2	2%	69	59%
David Fuchs	59	0	0%	0	0%	36	61%	19	32%	8	22%	28	78%	60	0	0%	0	0%	21	35%	39	65%	119	0	0%	0	0%	58	49%
Elen of the Roads	59	3	5%	3	5%	28	53%	19	36%	13	46%	15	54%	60	3	5%	0	0%	4	7%	53	93%	119	6	5%	3	3%	72	65%
Iridescent	53	22	42%	3	10%	11	39%	15	54%	2	18%	9	82%	56	25	45%	0	0%	1	3%	30	97%	109	47	43%	3	5%	45	76%
Jclemens	59	0	0%	0	0%	48	81%	7	12%	20	42%	28	58%	60	0	0%	0	0%	35	58%	25	42%	119	0	0%	0	0%	32	27%
John Vandenberg	59	0	0%	9	15%	38	76%	11	22%	15	39%	23	61%	60	0	0%	3	5%	9	16%	48	84%	119	0	0%	12	10%	59	55%
Kirill Lokshin	59	0	0%	3	5%	23	41%	32	57%	11	48%	12	52%	60	0	0%	0	0%	8	13%	52	87%	119	0	0%	3	3%	84	72%
Mailer diablo	59	11	19%	0	0%	17	35%	31	65%	9	53%	8	47%	60	8	13%	0	0%	0	0%	52	100%	119	19	16%	0	0%	83	83%
Newyorkbrad	59	0	0%	3	5%	40	71%	6	11%	12	30%	28	70%	60	0	0%	0	0%	41	68%	19	32%	119	0	0%	3	3%	25	22%
PhilKnight	59	0	0%	5	8%	37	69%	16	30%	13	35%	24	65%	60	0	0%	0	0%	29	48%	31	52%	119	0	0%	5	4%	47	41%
Risker	59	4	7%	1	2%	27	50%	19	35%	9	33%	18	67%	60	4	7%	1	2%	25	45%	30	55%	119	8	7%	2	2%	49	45%
Roger Davies	59	0	0%	0	0%	25	42%	30	51%	10	40%	15	60%	60	0	0%	2	3%	11	19%	47	81%	119	0	0%	2	2%	77	66%
Shell Kinney	39	0	0%	0	0%	16	41%	21	54%	8	50%	8	50%	36	0	0%	0	0%	16	44%	20	56%	75	0	0%	0	0%	41	55%
SirFozzie	59	7	12%	1	2%	39	76%	7	14%	14	36%	25	64%	60	2	3%	0	0%	39	67%	19	33%	119	9	8%	1	1%	26	24%
Xeno	59	7	12%	3	6%	19	39%	23	47%	6	32%	13	68%	60	8	13%	1	2%	31	61%	20	39%	119	15	13%	4	4%	43	43%
	Case requests													Clarifications and other requests									All requests

Arb activity (departing 2010)

Arb activity (departing 2010) — requests

Arb	ER	I	%	R	%	V	%	DNA	%	A	%	D	%	ER	I	%	R	%	C	%	DNA	%	ER	I	%	R	%	DNA	%
Carcharoth	0	0		0		0		0		0		0		5	0	0%	0	0%	5	100%	0	0%	5	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
FayssalF	0	0		0		0		0		0		0		0	0		0		0		0		0	0		0		0
KnightLago	0	0		0		0		0		0		0		5	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%	5	100%	5	0	0%	0	0%	5	100%
	Case requests													Clarifications and other requests									All requests

Motions

• Legend: S=Support, O=Oppose, A=Abstain, Ac=Active arbs, R=Recuse, I=Inactive/away, M=Majority, N=Not eligible, Offered = the arb who posted the motion.
• Publicly offered motions: 56; average duration: 10.7 days; passed: 30 (54%); failed: 26 (46%).

Motions involving 2011 arbs only

Motion	Per Request	Opened	Closed	Days	Disp	S	O	A	Ac	R	I	M	Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen	Offered
Abortion remedy 1 amemded (1)	Clarify : Abortion	14:44, 4-Dec-2011	11:55, 6-Dec-2011	2	Failed	3	2	1	12	3	1	6	O	R	I	S	S		N	A	O					R		N	S	R	Cor
Abortion remedy 1 amemded (1)	Clarify : Abortion	15:20, 4-Dec-2011	11:55, 6-Dec-2011	2	Passed	7	1	0	12	3	1	7	S	R	I	S	S		N	O	S				S	R	S	N	S	R	Rog
"Unblocks and enabling" motion	Unblocks and enabling	23:59, 7-Nov-2011	05:42, 26-Nov-2011	18	Failed	5	6	1	15	0	1	8	O	S	I	O	S	O	N	S	A				S	O	O	N	S	O	Sir
"Unblocks and enabling" motion 2	Unblocks and enabling	03:29, 9-Nov-2011	05:42, 26-Nov-2011	17	Failed	1	5	1	15	0	1	8	S		I	O	O	O	N		O				O			N		A	Cas
"Unblocks and enabling" motion 3	Unblocks and enabling	03:29, 9-Nov-2011	05:42, 26-Nov-2011	17	Failed	1	3	1	15	0	1	8	S		I		O	O	N		O							N		A	Cas
"Unblocks and enabling" motion 4	Unblocks and enabling	03:29, 9-Nov-2011	05:42, 26-Nov-2011	17	Failed	1	3	1	15	0	1	8	S		I		O	O	N		O							N		A	Cas
"Unblocks and enabling" motion 5	Unblocks and enabling	03:29, 9-Nov-2011	05:42, 26-Nov-2011	17	Failed	1	2	1	15	0	1	8	S		I		O		N		O							N		A	Cas
"Unblocks and enabling" motion 6	Unblocks and enabling	03:29, 9-Nov-2011	05:42, 26-Nov-2011	17	Failed	1	2	1	15	0	1	8	S		I		O		N		O							N		A	Cas
"Unblocks and enabling" motion 7	Unblocks and enabling	03:29, 9-Nov-2011	05:42, 26-Nov-2011	17	Failed	1	2	1	15	0	1	8	S		I		O		N		O							N		A	Cas
"Unblocks and enabling" motion 8	Unblocks and enabling	03:29, 9-Nov-2011	05:42, 26-Nov-2011	17	Failed	1	2	1	15	0	1	8	S		I		O		N		O							N		A	Cas
"Unblocks and enabling" motion 9	Unblocks and enabling	03:29, 9-Nov-2011	05:42, 26-Nov-2011	17	Failed	1	2	2	15	0	1	7	S		I	O	O		N		A							N		A	Cas
Scjessey restriction ended	Amend : Climate change	16:34, 11-Nov-2011	12:45, 17-Nov-2011	6	Passed	9	0	0	15	0	1	8	S		I	S	S		N			S		S	S	S	S	N	S		Kir
User:Δ case to be opened	Clarify Δ	18:03, 31-Oct-2011	00:30, 3-Nov-2011	2	Passed	11	0	0	15	0	2	8				S	S	S	I	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	N	S	I	Sir
Discretionary sanctions standardized		15:51, 18-Oct-2011	15:24, 27-Oct-2011	9	Passed	14	0	0	16	0	1	9	S	S		S	S	S	I	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	N	S	S	Cor
William M. Connolley topic ban modified	Amend : Climate change	03:00, 17-Oct-2011	21:38, 26-Oct-2011	10	Passed	8	2	0	14	1	2	8	S	S		S	O		I	O	S			S	S	S	S	N	R	I	New
Two Ohconfucius restrictions ended	Amend : Date delinking	13:35, 23-Aug-2011	16:57, 9-Sep-2011	17	Passed	8	5	0	15	1	1	8	R	S	S	S	S	O	I	O	O	S	O	S	S	O		N	S		Xen
Arbitrator abstention votes 1		13:00, 10-Aug-2011	14:08, 19-Aug-2011	9	Failed	3	9	0	14	0	3	8	O	I	I	O	O		I	O	S	O		O	O	S	S	N	O	O	Rog
Arbitrator abstention votes 2		13:00, 10-Aug-2011	14:08, 19-Aug-2011	9	Failed	3	9	0	14	0	3	8	O	I	I	O	O		I	O	S	O		O	O	S	S	N	O	O	Rog
Arbitrator abstention votes 3		23:00, 10-Aug-2011	14:08, 19-Aug-2011	9	Failed	4	7	0	14	0	3	8	O	I	I	O	O		I	O	S	O		O	S	S		N	S	O	Ris
Arbitrator abstention votes 3a		00:51, 11-Aug-2011	14:08, 19-Aug-2011	9	Failed	2	9	0	14	0	3	8	O	I	I	O	O		I	O	O	S		O	O	S		N	O	O	Kir
Arbitrator abstention votes 4		23:00, 10-Aug-2011	14:08, 19-Aug-2011	9	Failed	7	3	0	14	0	3	8		I	I	S	S		I	O	S	S		O	S	S		N	S	O	Ris
Arbitrator abstention votes 5		02:18, 12-Aug-2011	14:08, 19-Aug-2011	7	Failed	7	4	0	14	0	3	8	O	I	I	S	S		I	O	S	O		S	O	S		N	S	S	Xen
Arbitrator abstention votes 5.1		19:41, 12-Aug-2011	14:08, 19-Aug-2011	7	Passed	13	0	0	14	0	3	8	S	I	I	S	S		I	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	S	New
New editors on arbitration pages		16:28, 7-Aug-2011	19:47, 14-Aug-2011	7	Failed	6	8	0	16	0	1	9	O			S	S	O	I	S	S	O	O	O	O	S	S	N	O	O	Rog
Public ArbCom mailing list	Cults	19:13, 17-Jul-2011	15:49, 9-Aug-2011	23	Failed	6	8	1	16	0	1	8	O		S	O	S	S	I	O	O	S	S	O	A	O	S	N	O	O	Rog
Gilabrand block suspended	Amend : Palestine-Israel articles	13:33, 4-Aug-2011	15:36, 9-Aug-2011	5	Passed	8	0	0	14	0	3	8	S			S	S		I	S	S	S			S	I		N	I	S	Cas
Two cases accepted	Cults	19:13, 17-Jul-2011	23:02, 2-Aug-2011	16	Passed	12	0	1	15	1	1	8	S	S	S	R	S			S	S	S	S	S	S	I	S	N	S	A	Rog
Nishdani editing restrictions lifted	Amend : West Bank - Judea and Samaria	14:40, 11-Jul-2011	17:31, 21-Jul-2011	10	Passed	8	0	0	14	0	3	8	S			S	S		I	S		S	S		S	I		N	I	S	Xen
Betacommand (user:Δ) topic banned		20:43, 8-Jul-2011	18:38, 14-Jul-2011	6	Passed	10	1	2	15	0	2	8	A	S	S	S	S		I	S	A	S		S	O	I	S	N	S	S	Rog
Betacommand (user:Δ) site banned		20:43, 8-Jul-2011	18:38, 14-Jul-2011	6	Failed	3	8	1	15	0	2	8		S	O	O	O		I	S	A	S		O	O	I	O	N	O	O	Rog
Russavia - Miacek interactions allowed	Amend : Eastern European mailing list	14:01, 23-Jun-2011	00:55, 5-Jul-2011	11	Passed	10	0	0	16	0	1	9	S			S	S		I	S		S	S	S	S			N	S	S	Xen
Ed Poor topic ban amended	Amend : Ed Poor 2	16:16, 14-Jun-2011	19:54, 25-Jun-2011	11	Passed	10	0	0	16	1	1	9	S	I		S	S			R			S	S		S	S	S	S	S	Cor
Future Perfect temporary desysop lifted	Amend : Macedonia 2	16:29, 14-Jun-2011	16:45, 19-Jun-2011	5	Passed	11	0	0	17	0	1	9		I		S	S			S			S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	Cor
Biophys topic ban lifted	Amend : Russavia-Biophys	16:07, 14-Jun-2011	15:14, 19-Jun-2011	5	Passed	11	0	0	17	0	1	9		I		S	S			S			S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	Cas
Nabla desysopped	Nabla	00:02, 21-Jun-2011	04:25, 25-Jun-2011	4	Failed	5	7	2	17	0	1	8	S	I		O	O		S		O	S	O	A	O	O	S	O	S	A	Kir
Nabla's conduct diaspproved	Nabla	00:07, 23-Jun-2011	04:25, 25-Jun-2011	2	Passed	13	1	1	17	0	1	9	S	I		S	S	O		A	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	New
1. Barong (Jack Merridew) restrictions ended with caution	Clarify : Jack Merridew ban review motion	12:32, 11-May-2011	22:49, 4-Jun-2011	24	Failed	4	8	0	16	0	2	9		I	S	O		S	O	O		S	I	S	O	O	O	O	O		New
2. Barong (Jack Merridew) restrictions continued	Clarify : Jack Merridew ban review motion	13:17, 11-May-2011	22:49, 4-Jun-2011	24	Failed	3	9	0	16	0	2	9		I	O	S		O	O	S		O	I	O	O	O	S	O	O		Cor
3. Barong (Jack Merridew) restrictions to expire in 3 months	Clarify : Jack Merridew ban review motion	13:17, 11-May-2011	22:49, 4-Jun-2011	24	Failed	5	7	0	16	0	2	9		I	O	S		O	O	O		O	I	S	S	O	S	S	O		Cor
4. Barong (Jack Merridew) restrictions ended	Clarify : Jack Merridew ban review motion	13:23, 11-May-2011	22:49, 4-Jun-2011	24	Failed	5	7	0	16	0	2	9		I	O	O		S	S	O		S	I	S	S	O	O	O	O		Kir
5. Barong (Jack Merridew) restrictions modified	Clarify : Jack Merridew ban review motion	19:01, 12-May-2011	22:49, 4-Jun-2011	23	Passed	9	2	0	16	0	2	9		I	S	S	S		S	S		O	I	O	S	S	S		S		Sir
Mindbunny BLP restrictions	Mindbunny's comments on biographies of living persons	03:00, 23-May-2011	03:14, 1-Jun-2011	9	Failed	4	9	0	17	0	1	9		I	S		O	O	O	S	O	S	O	O		O	O	O	S		Kir
BLP and flagged revisions injunction	BLP and flagged revisions	00:46, 22-May-2011	15:51, 22-May-2011	1	Passed	9	0	0	15	0	3	8	S	I		S	S			S	S	S	I		S	S			S	I	Jcl
Moratorium on hyphen/endash article title changes	Hyphens and dashes	03:51, 11-May-2011	21:19, 16-May-2011	6	Passed	12	0	0	15	0	3	8	S	I		S	S	S	S	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S	I	Cas
Hyphen/endash discussions instructed	Hyphens and dashes	03:51, 11-May-2011	21:19, 16-May-2011	6	Passed	12	0	0	15	0	3	8	S	I		S	S	S	S	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S	I	Cas
YMB29 topic ban ended, 6 month revert restriction	Amend : "Russavia-Biophys"	20:45, 27-Apr-2011	15:00, 6-May-2011	9	Failed	4	5	2	15	0	3	7	S	I	S	O			A	A			I	S	S	O	O	O	O	I	New
YMB29 topic ban ended, 1 year revert restriction	Amend : "Russavia-Biophys"	18:41, 28-Apr-2011	15:00, 6-May-2011	8	Passed	7	2	3	16	0	2	7	S	I	S	S	S		A	A			I	S	S	A	S		O	O	New
Edit restriction amendment procedures	Amend : "Russavia-Biophys"	20:45, 27-Apr-2011	15:00, 6-May-2011	9	Passed	11	0	1	15	0	3	8	S	I	S	S	S		A	S			I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I	New
Remedy 5.1 amended	Calarify : Race and Intelligence	15:21, 12-Apr-2011	11:31, 15-Apr-2011	3	Passed	12	1	0	16	0	2	9	S	I	S	S	S	I		O	S	S		S	S		S	S	S	S	Rog
Ebonites case held in abeyance	Ebionites 2	02:34, 3-Mar-2011	13:51, 8-Mar-2011	5	Passed	9	0	1	15	0	2	8	S			S	S		I	S	A	S		S		I	S		S	S	Sir
Rodhullandemu admin privileges suspended	Rodhullandemu	02:59, 2-Mar-2011	04:19, 7-Mar-2011	5	Passed	13	2	0	17	0	1	9	S		S	O	S		I	O	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	Xen
Lightmouse bot restrictions relaxed	Amend : Date delinking (Lightmouse)	00:57, 6-Feb-2011	15:18, 8-Feb-2011	3	Passed	12	0	1	17	1	0	9	R	S	S		S			S		S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	A	New
Ohconfucius allowed bot account	Amend : Date delinking (Ohconfucius)	00:49, 6-Feb-2011	15:17, 8-Feb-2011	3	Passed	12	0	1	17	1	0	9	R	S	S		S			S		S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	A	New
Piotrus topic ban lifted	Amend : Eastern European mailing list	21:27, 4-Jan-2011	09:41, 4-Feb-2011	31	Passed	7	0	2	15	3	0	7	A	S		S	S		R	A				S		S	R	R	S	S	Cha
Koavf editing restrictions lifted	Amend : User:Koavf Community sanction	22:36, 3-Jan-2011	05:16, 10-Jan-2011	6	Passed	10	0	1	18	0	0	9		S			S	S		S		S	S	S	S	S			S	A	New
Jayjg editing restrictions lifted	Amend : West Bank - Judea and Samaria	02:05, 2-Jan-2011	18:43, 6-Jan-2011	5	Passed	12	0	0	18	0	0	10	S	S						S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S	S	S	Ris

• Failed*: Although receiving enough supports to pass, the motion failed in favor of an alternative motion.

Arb activity

The column headings, in table below, have the following meanings:

• EM (eligible motions): The total number of motions for which this arb was eligible to act (count of non-"N"s).
• I (inactive): The total number of motions for which this arb was listed at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee as inactive/away at the time of the motion's closing, and did not act on the motion (i.e. did not recuse. support, oppose or abstain) (count of "I"s); as a percentage of EM.
• R (recused): The total number of motions for which this arb recused (count of "R"s); as a percentage of (EM − I).
• V (voted): The total number of motions this arb voted to support or oppose (count of "S"s or "O"s); as a percentage of (EM − (I + R)).
• A (abstained): The total number of motions for which this arb abstained (count of "A"s), as a percentage of (EM − (I + R)).
• DNA (did not act): The total number of motions for which this arb was listed at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee as active at the time of the motion's closing, but did not act (count of empty cells); as a percentage of (EM − (I + R)).
• S (supported): The total number of motions this arb supported (count of "S"s); as a percentage of V.
• O (opposed): The total number of motions this arb opposed (count of "O"s); as a percentage of V.
• Offered: The total number of motions which this arb offered; as a percentage of the total number of motions.

Arb activity (2011) — motions

Arb	EM	I	%	R	%	V	%	A	%	DNA	%	S	%	O	%	Offered	%
Casliber	56	0	0%	3	5%	39	74%	2	4%	12	23%	30	77%	9	23%	12	21%
Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry	56	25	45%	2	6%	12	41%	0	0%	17	59%	12	100%	0	0%	1	2%
Cool Hand Luke	56	19	34%	0	0%	18	49%	0	0%	19	51%	14	78%	4	22%	0	0%
Coren	56	0	0%	1	2%	44	80%	0	0%	11	20%	30	68%	14	32%	6	11%
David Fuchs	56	0	0%	0	0%	50	89%	0	0%	6	11%	34	68%	16	32%	0	0%
Elen of the Roads	56	1	2%	0	0%	18	33%	0	0%	37	67%	8	44%	10	56%	0	0%
Iridescent	44	20	45%	1	4%	9	39%	3	13%	11	48%	5	56%	4	44%	0	0%
Jclemens	56	0	0%	1	2%	40	73%	5	9%	10	18%	25	63%	15	38%	1	2%
John Vandenberg	56	0	0%	0	0%	31	55%	5	9%	20	36%	18	58%	13	42%	0	0%
Kirill Lokshin	56	0	0%	0	0%	37	66%	0	0%	19	34%	29	78%	8	22%	5	9%
Mailer diablo	56	11	20%	0	0%	17	38%	0	0%	28	62%	13	76%	4	24%	0	0%
Newyorkbrad	56	0	0%	0	0%	41	73%	1	2%	14	25%	30	73%	11	27%	10	18%
PhilKnight	56	0	0%	0	0%	43	77%	1	2%	12	21%	32	74%	11	26%	0	0%
Risker	56	6	11%	2	4%	37	77%	1	2%	10	21%	27	73%	10	27%	3	5%
Roger Davies	56	0	0%	1	2%	36	65%	0	0%	19	35%	30	83%	6	17%	9	16%
Shell Kinney	25	0	0%	1	4%	17	71%	0	0%	7	29%	11	65%	6	35%	0	0%
SirFozzie	56	2	4%	1	2%	45	85%	0	0%	8	15%	33	73%	12	27%	4	7%
Xeno	56	7	13%	2	4%	26	55%	13	28%	8	17%	16	62%	10	38%	5	9%

Cases

• Legend: Ac=Active, R=Recused, I=Inactive/away, M=Majority, N=Not eligible, Drafter = the poster of the first draft on the case's "Proposed decision" page.
• Publicly heard cases: 16; average duration: 48 days; decided: 15 (94%); dismissed: 1 (6%).

Involving 2011 arbs only

Publicly heard cases involving 2011 arbs only

Case	Opened	Closed	Days	Disp	Ac	R	I	M	Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen	Drafter
Abortion	12-Aug-2011	28-Nov-2011	108	Decided	12	3	1	7		R	I				N							R		N		R	Sir
Senkaku Islands	17-Aug-2011	5-Oct-2011	49	Decided	12	2	3	7			I	R		R	I									N		I	Joh
Cirt and Jayen466	24-Jul-2011	10-Sep-2011	48	Decided	12	2	3	7				R			I		R					I		N		I	Dav
Manipulation of BLPs	2-Aug-2011	5-Sep-2011	34	Decided	14	1	2	8							I						R	I		N			New
MickMacNee	17-Jun-2011	4-Aug-2011	48	Decided	14	1	2	8							R							I		N	I		Kir
Tree shaping	28-Apr-2011	15-Jul-2011	78	Decided	15	0	2	8		I														N		I	Ele
Racepacket	30-Apr-2011	19-Jun-2011	51	Decided	12	3	3	7		I							R	R	I	R						I	Phi
Arbitration Enforcement sanction handling	12-Mar-2011	5-May-2011	54	Decided	13	1	4	7		I				I	R				I							I	Cor
Noleander	30-Mar-2011	18-Apr-2011	19	Decided	16	0	2	9		I				I													New
Rodhullandemu	7-Mar-2011	6-Apr-2011	30	Dismissed	12	4	2	7		I	R	R		R	R										I
Henri Coanda	22-Mar-2011	5-Apr-2011	14	Decided	16	0	2	9		I					I												New
Monty Hall problem	12-Feb-2011	25-Mar-2011	41	Decided	14	0	4	8		I					I							I			I		Dav
Kehrli 2	11-Feb-2011	16-Mar-2011	34	Decided	15	0	3	8							I							I				I	Dav
Shakespeare authorship question	16-Jan-2011	16-Feb-2011	32	Decided	16	1	1	9					I								R						New

Involving 2011 and departing 2010 arbs

Publicly heard cases Involving 2011 and departing 2010 arbs

Case	Opened	Closed	Days	Disp	Ac	R	I	M	Car	Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Fas	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Kni	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen	Drafter
Longevity	22-Nov-2010	17-Feb-2011	87	Decided	11	2	8	6	I		I			I	I	I	R		I		I			R					I	Kir
World War II	30-Nov-2010	10-Jan-2011	41	Decided	14	3	4	8	I						R	I	I		I	R						R				New

Arb activity

Legend

The column headings, in the two tables below, have the following meanings:

• EC (eligible cases): The total number of cases for which this arb was eligible to act (count of non-"N"s).
• Inactive: The total number of cases for which this arb was listed on the case's "Proposed decision" talk page as inactive/away (count of empty cells); as a percentage of EC.
• Recused: The total number of cases for which this arb was listed on the case's "Proposed decision" talk page as recused (count of "R"s); as a percentage of (EC − Inactive).
• Drafted: The total number of cases for which this arb posted the first draft of the case's "Proposed decision" page; as a percentage of the total number of cases decided.

Arb activity (2011)

Arb activity (2011) — cases

Arb	EC	Inactive	%	Recused	%	Drafted	%
Casliber	16	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry	16	8	50%	1	13%	0	0%
Cool Hand Luke	16	2	13%	1	7%	0	0%
Coren	16	0	0%	3	19%	1	7%
David Fuchs	16	2	13%	0	0%	3	20%
Elen of the Roads	16	3	19%	3	23%	1	7%
Iridescent	15	7	47%	4	50%	0	0%
Jclemens	16	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
John Vandenberg	16	2	13%	2	14%	1	7%
Kirill Lokshin	16	0	0%	2	13%	2	13%
Mailer diablo	16	2	13%	0	0%	0	0%
Newyorkbrad	16	0	0%	1	6%	5	33%
PhilKnight	16	0	0%	3	19%	1	7%
Risker	16	5	31%	1	9%	0	0%
Roger Davies	16	0	0%	1	6%	0	0%
Shell Kinney	10	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
SirFozzie	16	3	19%	0	0%	1	7%
Xeno	16	7	44%	1	11%	0	0%

Arb activity (departing 2010)

Arb activity (departing 2010) — cases

Arb	EC	Inactive	%	Recused	%	Drafted	%
Carcharoth	2	2	100%	0		0	0%
FayssalF	0	0		0		0	0%
KnightLago	2	1	50%	0	0%	0	0%

Proposals

• Legend: S=Support, O=Oppose, A=Abstain, Ac=Active, R=Recused, I=Inactive/away, M=Majority, N=Not eligible. An "S1" indicates the first supporting vote. The numbers in the second set of arb columns give the length of time (rounded to the nearest day) between the first action (support, oppose or abstain) on this proposal and this arb's action.
• Proposals: 337; passed: 263 (78%); failed: 74 (22%).

For cases involving 2011 arbs only

Case proposals for cases involving 2011 arbs only

Senkaku Islands - Proposals (AC=12, R=2, I=3)		Disp	S	O	A	M		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Purpose of Wikipedia	P1	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0	0			1			3	0	3	2	1	0	2	1		0
Neutral point of view and undue weight	P2	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0	7			1			3	0	3	2	1	0	2	1		0
Decorum	P3	Passed	11	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S		S	N	S	I		0	7			1			3	0	3	2	1	0		1		0
Consensus	P4	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0	7			1			3	0	3	2	1	0	2	1		0
Talk pages	P5	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0	7			1			3	0	3	2	1	0	2	1		0
Role of the Arbitration Committee	P6	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0	7			1			3	0	3	2	1	0	2	1		0
Disruptive and tendentious editing	P7	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0	7			1			3	0	3	2	1	0	2	1		0
Edit wars are harmful	P8	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0	7			1			3	0	3	2	1	0	2	1		0
Disputes regarding article titles	P9	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0	7			1			3	0	3	2	1	0	2	1		0
Focus of the dispute	F1	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0	7			1			3	0	3	2	2	0	2	2		0
Real-world catalyst	F2	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0	7			1			3	0	3	2	2	0	2	2		0
Mediation unsuccessful	F3	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0	7			1			3	0	3	2	2	0	2	2		0
Tenmei's history	F4	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0	7			1			3	0	3	2	2	0	2	2		0
Tenmei and disputes	F5	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		6	7			1			3	0	3	2	2	0	2	2		0
Bobthefish2's history	F6	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		6	7			1			3	0	3	2	2	0	2	2		0
Bobthefish2	F7	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		6	7			1			3	0	3	2	2	0	2	2		0
STSC's history	F8	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		6	7			1			3	0	3	2	2	0	2	2		0
STSC	F9	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		6	7			1			3	0	3	2	2	0	2	2		0
Tenmei topic banned for one year	R1A	Failed*	11	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		7	11			3				0	3	7	4	2	5	7		0
Tenmei topic banned indefinitely	R1B	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		7	11			3			3	0	3	7	4	2	5	7		0
Tenmei warned	R2	Failed	4	6	0	7			O	I	R	S	R	I		S1	O	O	S	O	O	O	N	S	I			11			3				0	3	7	4	2	5	7		0
Tenmei advised	R2A	Passed	7	4	0	7			O	I	R	S	R	I	S	S	O	S	S	S1	O	O	N	S	I			9			1			7	4	1	5	2	0	3	5		0
Tenmei banned for one year	R3A	Passed	10	1	0	7			S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	O	S	S	S	N	S	I			11			3			3	0	3	7	4	0	5	7		0
Tenmei banned indefinitely	R3B	Failed	5	7	0	7		O	O	I	R	O	R	I	S	S1	O	O	O	S	S	O	N	S	I		6	11			3			9	0	3	7	4	2	5	7		0
Bobthefish2 advised	R4	Failed	3	8	0	7		O	S	I	R	O	R	I	O	S1	O	O	S	O		O	N	O	I		6	11			6			9	0	3	7	4	2		7		0
Bobthefish2 topic banned	R4A	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S1	I		5	10			3			3	0	3	6	3	0	5	7		0
STSC warned	R5	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		6	11			3			3	0	3	7	4	1	5	7		0
Parties reminded	R6	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		6	11			3			3	0	3	7	4	0	5	7		0
Discretionary sanctions	R7	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		6	11			3			3	0	3	7	4	0	5	7		0
Discretionary sanctions for naming of disputed geographical regions	R8	Failed	4	7	0	7			O	I	R	O	R	I	S	S1	O	O	O	S	O	O	N	S	I			11			3			3	0	3	7	4	2	5	7		0
Discretionary sanctions for naming of disputed islands in East Asia	R8A	Passed	9	2	0	7			S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	O	S	S	S	O	S	N	S	I			7			2			1	0	1	3	0	0	1	3		2
Enforcement by block	E1	Passed	9	0	0	7			S	I	R	S	R	I	S	S1	S		S	S	S		N	S	I			11			3			3	0	3		4	0	5			2
Cirt and Jayen466 - Proposals (AC=11, R=3, I=3)		Disp	S	O	A	M		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Collegiality	P1	Passed	11	0	0	6		S	S	S	R	S	R	I	S	R	S	S	S	S1	I	S	N	S	I		0	1	0		1			0		1	1	0	0		1		1
Neutral point of view and undue weight	P2	Passed	11	0	0	6		S	S	S	R	S	R	I	S	R	S	S	S	S1	I	S	N	S	I		0	1	0		1			0		1	1	0	0		1		1
Bias and prejudice	P3	Failed*	6	4	1	6		O	S	A	R	S	R	I	O	R	O	O	S	S1	I	S	N	S	I		1	2	0		1			0		1	4	0	0		1		1
Bias and prejudice	P3.1	Passed	6	4	0	6		S1	S		R	S	R	I	O	R	O	S	S	O	I	S	N	O	I		0	1			1			0		1	0	1	5		8		2
Biographies of living people	P4	Passed	11	0	0	6		S	S	S	R	S	R	I	S	R	S	S	S	S1	I	S	N	S	I		0	2	0		1			0		1	1	0	0		1		1
Fair criticism and personal attacks	P5	Passed	11	0	0	6		S	S	S	R	S	R	I	S	R	S	S	S	S1	I	S	N	S	I		0	2	0		1			0		1	1	0	0		1		1
Cirt's editing	F1	Passed	11	0	0	6		S	S	S	R	S	R	I	S	R	S	S	S	S1	I	S	N	S	I		1	2	0		1			0		1	1	0	0		1		1
Jayen466's conduct	F2	Passed	8	3	0	6		S	O	S	R	S	R	I	S	R	O	S	O	S1	I	S	N	S	I		1	2	5		1			0		1	1	0	0		1		3
Cirt topic-banned from new religious movement ("NRM") articles	R1	Passed	11	0	0	6		S	S	S	R	S	R	I	S	R	S	S	S	S1	I	S	N	S	I		1	2	0		1			0		1	1	0	0		1		1
Cirt restricted for all BLPs	R2	Failed	5	5	0	6		O	S	S1	R	O	R	I		R	O	S	O	O	I	S	N	S	I		1	10	0		1					1	1	0	0		1		1
Cirt restricted from BLPs	R2.1	Failed	4	7	0	6		O	O	S	R	O	R	I	S	R	O	S	S1	O	I	O	N	O	I		1	6	0		5			2		2	2	0	2		6		1
Cirt restricted from "political" biographies	R2.2	Failed*	7	4	0	6		S	S	S	R	O	R	I	S	R	O	S	S1	O	I	O	N	S	I		1	2	0		5			0		2	2	0	4		4		1
Cirt restricted from political, religious and social controversy biographies	R2.3	Passed	11	0	0	6		S	S	S	R	S	R	I	S	R	S	S	S	S	I	S1	N	S	I		1	3	0		2			0		1	2	0	0		0		1
Cirt desysopped	R3	Passed	6	5	0	6		O	S	O	R	O	R	I	S	R	S	S	O	O	I	S1	N	S	I		2	1	2		4			1		3	4	2	0		0		1
Jayen466 reminded	R4	Passed	8	3	0	6		S	S	O	R	S	R	I	S	R	O	S	O	S1	I	S	N	S	I		1	2	0		1			0		1	1	0	0		1		3
Cirt and Jayen: interaction restriction	R5	Passed	10	1	0	6		S	S	S	R	S	R	I	S	R	S	S	O	S1	I	S	N	S	I		0	2	0		1			0		1	1	0	0		1		1
Enforcement by block	E1	Passed	10	0	0	6		S	S		R	S	R	I	S	R	S	S	S	S1	I	S	N	S	I		1	2			1			0		1	1	1	0		1		1
Removal of Administrator privileges if problems recur	E2	Failed*	8	2	0	6		O	S		R	O	R	I	S1	R	S	S	S	S	I	S	N	S	I		1	2			1			0		1	1	1	5		1		1
Manipulation of BLPs - Proposals (AC=14, R=1, I=2)		Disp	S	O	A	M		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Biographies of living persons	P1	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I	S	N	S	S		0	3	6		1			0	5	2	2	0			0		2	0
Standards for biographical articles	P2	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I	S	N	S	S		0	3	6		1			0	5	2	2	0			0		2	0
Application of the BLP policy	P3	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I	S	N	S	S		0	3	6		1			0	5	2	2	0			0		2	0
Enforcement of the BLP policy	P4	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I	S	N	S	S		0	3	6		1			0	5	2	2	0			0		2	0
Conflicts of interest	P5	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I	S	N	S	S		0	3	6		1			0	5	2	2	0			0		2	0
Types of conflict of interest or bias	P6	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I	S	N	S	S		0	3	6		1			0	5	2	2	0			0		2	0
Manipulation of search engine results	P7	Passed	10	2	0	8		S	S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I	O	N	S	O		0	3	6		2			0	5	2	2	0			2		2	2
Role of the Arbitration Committee	P8	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I	S	N	S	S		0	3	6		2			0	5	2	2	0			0		2	0
Origin of the case	F1	Passed	11	0	0	8		S	S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I		N	S	S		0	3	6		2			0	5	2	2	0					2	2
Nature of the case	F2	Passed	11	0	0	8		S	S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I		N	S	S		0	3	6		2			0	5	2	2	0					2	2
Evidence in this case	F3	Passed	10	0	0	8			S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I		N	S	S			3	6		2			0	5	2	2	0					2	2
Editors reminded	R1	Passed	11	0	0	8		S	S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I		N	S	S		0	3	6		2			0	5	2	2	0					2	0
Editors urged	R2	Passed	11	0	0	8		S	S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I		N	S	S		0	3	6		2			0	5	2	2	0					2	0
Parties urged	R3	Passed	11	0	0	8		S	S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I		N	S	S		0	3	6		2			0	5	2	2	0					2	2
Future dispute resolution	R4	Passed	11	0	0	8		S	S	S		S		I	S	S	S	S	S1	R	I		N	S	S		0	3	6		2			0	5	2	2	0					2	2
MickMacNee - Proposals (AC=14, R=1, I=2)		Disp	S	O	A	M		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Collegiality	P1	Passed	14	0	0	8		S	S	S	S	S	S	R	S	S	S1	S	S	S	I	S	N	I	S		0	1	5	2	2	6		0	3	0	0	0	0		0			3
Collegiality and prohibited conduct	P2	Passed	14	0	0	8		S	S	S	S	S	S	R	S	S	S1	S	S	S	I	S	N	I	S		0	1	5	2	2	6		0	3	0	0	0	0		0			3
Recidivism	P3	Passed	14	0	0	8		S	S	S	S	S	S	R	S	S	S1	S	S	S	I	S	N	I	S		0	1	5	2	2	6		0	3	0	0	0	0		0			3
Conduct of administrators	P4	Passed	11	0	2	7		S	S	S	S		S	R	S	A	S1	S	S	S	I	S	N	I	A		0	1	5	2		6		0	3	0	0	0	0		0			3
Involved administrators	P5	Passed	10	0	0	8			S	S			S	R	S	S	S		S1	S	I	S	N	I	S			0	0			2		0	0	0		0	0		0			2
MickMacNee (I)	F1	Passed	13	0	0	8		S	S		S	S	S	R	S	S	S1	S	S	S	I	S	N	I	S		0	1		2	8	6		0	3	0	2	0	0		0			3
MickMacNee (II)	F2	Passed	13	0	0	8		S	S		S	S	S	R	S	S	S1	S	S	S	I	S	N	I	S		0	1		2	8	6		0	3	0	2	0	0		0			3
Rd232	F3	Failed	4	2	6	5		A	A		A		O	R	S	S	S1	A	O	A	I	S	N	I	A		0	1		2		6		4	3	0	2	0	0		5			3
Rd232	F3.1	Passed	5	1	5	5		S	A			A	A	R	S	S1	S		A	A	I	S	N	I	O		0	1			4	2		0	0	0		1	1		1			3
Hammersoft	F4	Failed	2	8	3	6		O	A		A	O	O	R	O	S	S1	O	O	O	I	O	N	I	A		0	1		2	8	6		0	3	0	2	0	0		0			3
Δ	F5	Passed	10	0	3	6		S	A		S	S	S	R	S	A	S1	S	A	S	I	S	N	I	S		0	1		2	8	6		0	3	0	2	0	0		0			3
MickMacNee banned (1 year, then indefinitely)	R1	Passed	11	2	0	8		S	S		S	O	S	R	S	S	S1	S	S	S	I	S	N	I	O		0	1		2	8	6		0	3	0	2	0	0		0			3
MickMacNee banned (1 year)	R1.1	Failed*	8	4	0	8		S	S			S	O	R	O	S	S1	O	S	S	I	O	N	I	S		0	1			8	6		0	3	0	2	0	0		0			3
Rd232 admonished and warned	R2	Failed	5	8	0	8		S	O		O	O	O	R	S	S	S1	O	O	O	I	S	N	I	O		4	1		2	8	6		4	3	0	2	0	0		5			7
Hammersoft admonished and warned	R3	Failed	1	10	2	7		O	A		O	O	O	R	O	O	S1	O	O	O	I	O	N	I	A		0	1		2	8	6		1	3	0	2	0	0		0			3
Δ admonished and warned	R4	Passed	11	0	2	7		S	S		S	S	S	R	S	A	S1	S	A	S	I	S	N	I	S		0	1		2	8	6		0	3	0	2	0	0		0			3
Δ banned	R4.1	Failed	1	9	3	6		A	O		O	O	O	R	S1	A	O	A	O	O	I	O	N	I	O		0	0		2	8	6		0	3	4	2	1	0		0			2
Tree shaping - Proposals (AC=15, R=0, I=2)		Disp	S	O	A	M		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Purpose of Wikipedia	P1	Passed	13	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	2	12	8	0	0	6	6		1
Neutral point of view and undue weight	P2	Passed	13	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	2	12	8	0	0	6	6		1
Decorum	P3	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	2	12	8	0	0		6		1
Consensus	P4	Passed	13	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	2	12	8	0	0	6	6		1
Single-purpose accounts	P5	Passed	13	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	2	12	8	0	0	6	6		1
Talk pages	P6	Passed	13	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	2	12	8	0	0	6	6		1
Role of the Arbitration Committee	P7	Passed	13	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	2	12	8	0	0	6	6		1
Disruptive and tendentious editing	P8	Passed	13	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	2	12	8	0	0	6	6		1
Expert editors	P9	Passed	11	0	1	8		S	I	A		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	2	12	8	0	0		6		1
Disputes regarding article titles	P10	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S		S	S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	2	12	8	0		6	6		1
Neologisms in article titles	P11	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S		S	S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	2	12	8	0		6	6		1
Focus of the dispute	F1	Passed	13	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	3	12	8	0	0	6	6		1
No single name for this topic	F2	Passed	13	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	8	12	8	0	0	6	6		1
Some editors have a potential conflict of interest	F3	Passed	13	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	8	12	8	0	0	6	6		1
Current name	F4	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S		S	S	N	S	I		0		15		6	0		1	8	12	8	0		6	6		1
Blackash has a conflict of interest	F5	Passed	11	1	1	8		S1	I	O		S	S		S	A	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0		13		4	1		4	7	10	7	5	1	4	4		0
Sydney Bluegum is an SPA	F6	Failed*	11	1	0	8		S1	I	S		S			S	S	O	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0		15		6			6	8	11	8	6	3	6	6		1
Sydney Bluegum is an SPA	F6A	Passed	13	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0		12		3	0		3	5	9	5	4	0	3	3		5
Slowart has a conflict of interest	F7	Passed	11	1	1	8		S1	I	O		S	S		S	A	S	S	S	S	S	S	N	S	I		0		13		4	1		4	7	10	7	5	1	4	4		0
Blackash	R1A	Failed	4	4	0	8		O	I	O		S				O	O		S	S			N	S1	I		7		11		2				4	8		3	0				0
Blackash	R1B	Failed	1	3	1	8		O	I	O		A				S1	O						N		I		5		9		0				3	6
Blackash	R1C	Passed	10	1	0	8		S	I	S		O	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S	S		N		I		2		9		0	1		4	3	6	8	6	4	3
Sydney Bluegum	R2A	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S		S	S	S	S	S	S1	S		N	S	I		0		9		0	0		4	3	6	8	1	0	3			0
Sydney Bluegum	R2B	Failed	1	1	0	8			I	S1							O						N		I				3							0
Sydney Bluegum	R2C	Failed	3	3	0	8		S	I	O		O			S1		O		S				N		I		5		9		0			4		6		6
Slowart	R3A	Failed	4	5	0	8		O	I	O		S			O	O	O		S	S1			N	S	I		0		9		0			4	3	6		1	0				3
Slowart	R3B	Failed	0	4	0	8		O	I	O						O	O						N		I		2		7						0	3
Slowart	R3C	Passed	10	1	0	8		S	I	S		O	S1		S	S	S	S	S	S	S		N		I		3		9		0	1		4	3	6	8	6	4	3
Article and subject scope	R4	Passed	11	0	0	8		S1	I	S		S	S		S	S	S	S	S		S		N	S	I		0		9		2	4		2	2	5	8	0		2			2
Discretionary Sanctions	R5	Passed	11	0	0	8		S	I	S		S	S		S	S	S	S	S		S		N	S1	I		0		7		2	2		0	0	3	6	3		0			0
Community restrictions superseded	R6	Passed	10	0	0	8		S	I	S		S			S	S		S	S	S	S		N	S1	I		0		2		0			1	0		1	4	0	0			0
Enforcement by block	E1	Passed	10	0	1	8		S	I			S	S		S	A	S	S	S	S1	S		N	S	I		0				2	0		1	3	6	8	1	0	3			0
Racepacket - Proposals (AC=12, R=3, I=3)		Disp	S	O	A	M		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Purpose of Wikipedia	P1	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	R	R	I	R	S1	S	S	S	S	I		0		23	17	0	20	20	2					0	4	25	22	0
Decorum	P2	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	R	R	I	R	S1	S	S	S	S	I		0		23	17	0	24	20	2					0	4	25	22	0
Perceived harassment	P3	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	R	R	I	R	S1	S	S	S	S	I		0		23	17	0	24	20	2					0	4	25	22	0
Outing	P4	Passed	11	1	0	7		S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	R	R	I	R	S1	O	S	S	S	I		0		23	17	0	24	20	2					0	0	25	22	0
Conduct outside Wikipedia	P5	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	R	R	I	R	S1	S	S	S	S	I		0		23	17	0	24	20	2					0	4	25	22	0
Sanctions and circumstances	P6	Passed	8	1	3	5		S	I	S	A	S	O	A	S	R	R	I	R	S1	S	S	A	S	I		0		23	17	0	24	20	2					0	4	25	22	0
Good article assessment	P7	Passed	11	0	1	6		S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	R	R	I	R	S	S1	S	S	A	I		0		19	15	12	20	17	3					0	0	21	19	0
Administrator involvement	P8	Passed	9	1	1	6		S	I	S	O	S	S		S	R	R	I	R	S	S1	S	S	A	I		0		19	13	12	20		3					0	0	21	19	0
Wikipedia and eventualism	P9	Passed	5	3	3	5		S	I	A	A		O	O	S	R	R	I	R	O	S1	S	S	A	I		0		19	13		20	17	3					0	0	21	19	0
Racepacket's block log	F1	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	R	R	I	R	S1	S	S	S	S	I		0		23	17	1	24	20	7					0	22	25	22	0
Racepacket's conduct	F2	Passed	10	1	1	6		S	I	S	S	S	S	S	A	R	R	I	R	S1	O	S	S	S	I		1		23	17	1	24	20	7					0	4	25	22	0
Racepacket's conduct (alt)	F2.1	Failed	4	7	0	7		O	I	S	S		O	O	S	R	R	I	R	O	S1	O	O	O	I		0		19	13		20	17	3					0	0	21	19	0
Racepacket's involvement with road related Good Article Reviews	F3	Passed	10	1	1	6		S	I	S	S	S	S	A	S	R	R	I	R	S1	O	S	S	S	I		2		23	17	18	24	20	7					0	4	25	22	0
Racepacket's involvement with netball related Good Article Reviews	F4	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	R	R	I	R	S1	S	S	S	S	I		2		23	17	18	24	20	7					0	22	25	22	0
Racepacket's communication	F5	Failed	2	6	2	6		O	I		O		O	A	S	R	R	I	R	A	S1	O	O	O	I		17			13		21	17	3					0	0	21	19	0
Hawkeye7	F6	Passed	11	0	0	7		S	I		S	S	S	S	S	R	R	I	R	S	S1	S	S	S	I		0			13	14	21	17	3					0	0	21	19	16
LauraHale	F7	Failed	3	4	4	5		O	I		A	O	A	S	S	R	R	I	R	O	S1	A	A	O	I		17			13	14	21	17	3					0	0	21	19	0
The Wikimedia Foundation as an employer	F8	Failed	1	9	1	6		O	I		O	O	O	O	A	R	R	I	R	O	S1	O	O	O	I		15			13	14	21	17	3					0	0	21	19	0
Interactions between LauraHale and Racepacket	F9	Passed	8	0	3	5		S	I		S	A	A	S	S	R	R	I	R	S1	A	S	S	S	I		10			8	9	15	11	4					0	13	16	13	0
Hawkeye7 has a Conflict of Interest with regards to LauraHale	F10	Passed	10	0	0	7		S	I			S	S	S	S	R	R	I	R	S	S	S	S	S1	I		0				1	5	1	3					2	3	5	3	0
Racepacket banned	R1	Passed	9	2	0	7		S	I		S	S	S	O	S	R	R	I	R	S1	O	S	S	S	I		20			17	2	24	20	7					0	4	25	22	0
Racepacket banned (3 months)	R1.1	Failed*	6	3	1	6		S1	I		O		S	S	S	R	R	I	R	A	S	O	S	O	I		0			13		21	17	3					0	18	21	19	0
Racepacket topic banned (roads)	R2	Failed	4	6	1	6		S	I		O	O	O	A	S	R	R	I	R	S1	O	O	O	S	I		7			17	1	24	20	7					0	4	25	22	0
Racepacket topic banned (netball, 12 months)	R3	Failed	6	5	0	7		S	I		O	O	O	S	S	R	R	I	R	S1	O	S	O	S	I		7			17	1	24	20	7					0	25	25	22	0
Racepacket topic banned (netball, 6 months)	R3.1	Failed	5	4	2	6		S	I		O	O	O	S	S	R	R	I	R	A	S1	S	O	A	I		5			13	14	21	17	18					1	0	21	19	0
Hawkeye7 admonished	R4	Passed	7	3	0	7		O	I		O		S	S	S	R	R	I	R	O	S1	S	S	S	I		23			13		21	17	3					0	0	21	19	16
Hawkeye7 reminded (alt)	R4.1	Failed*	7	4	0	7		S1	I		S	S	O	S	S	R	R	I	R	S	O	O	S	O	I		0			13	14	24	17	3					0	24	21	19	23
Hawkeye7 cautioned (another alternative)	R4.2	Failed	2	2	0	7			I						S	R	R	I	R	S1		O		O	I									0					0		1		0
Hawkeye7 banned from reviewing Good article nominees	R5	Failed	2	7	2	6		A	I		A	O	O	O	S	R	R	I	R	O	S1	O	O	O	I		2			13	14	21	17	3					0	0	21	19	0
LauraHale reminded	R6	Failed	6	4	0	7		S	I		O		S	S	S	R	R	I	R	O	S1	O	S	O	I		17			13		21	17	3					0	0	21	19	0
Interaction ban	R7	Passed	11	0	0	7		S	I		S	S	S	S	S	R	R	I	R	S	S	S	S	S1	I		0			13	14	21	17	3					6	0	21	19	0
Hawkeye7 restriction	R8	Passed	11	0	0	7		S	I		S	S	S	S	S	R	R	I	R	S	S	S	S	S1	I		0			2	2	5	1	3					2	3	8	3	0
Enforcement by block	E1	Passed	11	0	0	7		S	I		S	S	S	S	S	R	R	I	R	S1	S	S	S	S	I		2			17	18	24	20	7					0	22	28	22	0
Arbitration Enforcement sanction handling - Proposals (AC=13, R=1, I=4)		Disp	S	O	A	M		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Decorum	P1	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	I		S	S	I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	I		0			0	3			0	1	20		1	0	17	15	20	2
Working in complex areas	P2.1	Passed	12	0	0	7			I	S	S	S	I	R	S	S	S	I	S1	S	S	S	S	S	I				0	0	2			0	5	19		0	2	16	15	19	3
Administrators are not perfect	P2.2	Failed*	9	3	0	7		S	I	S	S1	S	I	R	O	S	O	I	S	S	O		S	S	I		1		0	0	3			19	1	20		1	0	17		20	0
Administrators are not perfect	P2.2.1	Passed	11	0	0	7			I	S		S	I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	I				0		0			0	17	17		7	0	14	13	17	1
Learning from experience	P2.3	Passed	12	0	0	7			I	S	S	S	I	R	S	S	S	I	S1	S	S	S	S	S	I				0	0	2			0	5	19		0	0	16	15	19	1
Deliberate and careful use of discretionary sanctions	P3.1	Failed	3	8	1	7		S	I	A	S1		I	R	S	O	O	I	O	O	O	O	O	O	I		1		0	0				1	1	20		1	0	17	17	20	0
Deliberate and careful use of discretionary sanctions (alt 1)	P3.1.1	Failed	4	8	0	7		S	I	S1	S		I	R	S	O	O	I	O	O	O	O	O	O	I		0		0	1				0	0	20		1	0	17	16	20	0
Deliberate and careful use of discretionary sanctions	P3.1.2	Passed	13	0	0	7		S	I	S	S	S	I	R	S	S	S	I	S1	S	S	S	S	S	I		0		0	0	2			0	5	19		0	0	16	15	19	1
Rationales in warnings and sanction notices	P3.2	Passed	13	0	0	7		S	I	S	S	S	I	R	S	S	S	I	S1	S	S	S	S	S	I		0		0	0	2			0	5	19		0	0	16	15	19	1
Arbitration case sanctions	P3.3	Passed	9	2	1	7		S	I		S	S	I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S1	A	O	O	S	I		0			0	3			0	1	20		1	0	17	15	20	2
Care in invoking remedies	P3.4	Failed	2	7	4	5		A	I	O	S1	A	I	R	S	O	O	I	A	O	O	O	O	A	I		1		0	0	3			1	1	20		1	0	17	17	20	0
Unilateral reversal is prohibited	P4.1	Passed	8	4	0	7		S	I	S	S1	S	I	R	O	O	O	I	S	S		O	S	S	I		1		0	0	3			1	1	20		1	0		16	20	0
Procedure for reversal	P4.2	Passed	10	0	1	7			I	S	A		I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S1	S	S	I				6	3				0	7	7		3	2	4	0	7	3
Locus of dispute	F1	Passed	13	0	0	7		S	I	S	S1	S	I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I		1		0	0	3			0	1	20		1	0	17	11	20	0
Case acceptance rationale by arbitrators	F2	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	I	S	S		I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S1	S	S	I		6		0	12				0	17	16		1	0	14	0	16	0
Ludwigs2's inappropriate remarks	F3	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	I	S	S		I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S1	S	S	I		1		4	1				0	5	5		1	0	2	0	5	0
September 2008 notification to Ludwigs2	F4	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	I	S	S		I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S1	S	S	I		3		15	12				0	17	16		7	0	14	0	16	0
March 2011 block warning to Ludwigs2 by Sandstein	F5	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	I	S	S		I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S1	S	S	I		3		15	12				0	17	16		7	0	14	0	16	1
Ludwigs2 requests clarification	F6	Passed	10	0	2	6		S	I	S	S		I	R	S	S	S	I	S	A	S	S1	S	A	I		0		10	7				0	11	10		1	2	8	0	10	0
Block by Sandstein	F7	Passed	13	0	0	7		S	I	S	S1	S	I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I		1		0	0	3			0	1	20		1	0	17	16	20	0
Unblock by Dreadstar	F8	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	I	S	S1		I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I		1		0	0				0	1	20		1	0	17	16	20	0
Ludwigs2's redaction of remarks	F9	Failed	6	6	0	7		S	I	S	O		I	R	S	O	O	I	S	O	S	S1	O	O	I		0		10	7				0	11	10		1	2	8	0	10	0
Ludwigs2's redaction of remarks	F9.1	Failed	5	4	1	7			I	S	O		I	R	A	S	O	I	S	S1	O		O	S	I				8	5				1	9	9		1	0	6		9	0
Ludwigs2's redaction of remarks	F9.2	Passed	9	1	1	7			I	S	O		I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S1	S	A	I				4	1				0	5	5		1	0	2	0	5	0
Applicability of the block	F10	Failed	6	6	1	7		S	I	O	S1	O	I	R	A	O	S	I	S	S	O	O	O	S	I		1		19	0	3			10	1	20		1	0	17	16	20	0
Dreadstar's apology	F11	Passed	12	0	0	7		S	I	S	S		I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S1	S	S	I		0		10	7				0	11	10		1	1	8	0	10	0
Sandstein's communications	F12	Passed	10	0	2	6		S	I	S	A		I	R	S	S	S	I	A	S	S	S1	S	S	I		0		10	7				0	11	10		1	2	8	0	10	7
Dreadstar admonished	R1	Failed*	8	5	0	7		S	I	O	S1	S	I	R	O	O	S	I	S	S	O	O	S	S	I		0		16	0	0			0	3	17		15	0	17	14	17	1
Dreadstar reminded	R1.1	Passed	12	0	1	7		S	I	S	A	S	I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S1	S	S	I		0		0	1	3			0	2	1		0	1	1	0	1	0
Sandstein advised	R2	Passed	10	1	2	6		S	I	S	A	S	I	R	S	S	S	I	A	S	O	S1	S	S	I		0		10	7	8			0	11	10		7	2	10	0	10	7
Sandstein reminded	R2.1	Failed	5	1	2	6			I	S	A		I	R		S	O	I	A		S	S1	S		I				0	1					2	1		0		1	0	1
Ludwigs2 cautioned	R3	Passed	11	1	1	7		S	I	A	S	S	I	R	S	O	S	I	S	S1	S	S	S	S	I		0		8	5	6			1	9	9		6	0	8	6	9	0
Ludwigs2 reminded	R3.1	Failed*	9	1	0	7		S	I	S			I	R	S	S	O	I	S		S	S1	S	S	I		0		0					1	2	1		0		1	0	1	0
Administrators advised	R4	Passed	11	0	1	7		S	I	S	S		I	R	S	S	S	I	S	A	S	S1	S	S	I		1		4	1				0	5	5		1	0	4	0	5	4
Administrators reminded	R5	Passed	11	0	0	7		S	I		S	S	I	R	S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S1	S		I		0			0	1			1	5	4		1	0	4	0	4
Noleander - Proposals (AC=16, R=0, I=2)		Disp	S	O	A	M		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Purpose of Wikipedia	P1	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		0		1		1		2	0	3	1		0	0	2	1	4	0	2
Neutral point of view	P2	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		0		1		1		2	0	3	1		0	0	2	1	4	0	2
Accuracy of sourcing	P3	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		0		1		1		2	0	3	1		0	0	2	1	4	0	2
Errors in editing	P4	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		0		1		1		2	0	3	1		0	0	2	1	4	0	2
Disruptive and tendentious editing	P5	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		0		1		1		2	0	3	1		0	0	2	1	4	0	2
Sensitivities of subject-matter	P6	Passed	12	0	0	9		S	I	S		S	I		S	S	S		S1		S	S	S	S	S		0		1		1			0	3	1		0		2	1	4	0	2
Bias and prejudice	P7	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		0		1		1		2	0	3	1		0	0	2	1	4	0	2
Remedies for biased editing	P8	Passed	12	0	1	8		S	I	S		S	I		S	S	S		S1	S	A	S	S	S	S		0		1		1			0	3	1		0	0	2	1	4	0	2
References to fellow editors	P9	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		0		1		1		2	0	3	1		0	0	2	1	4	0	2
Locus of dispute	F1	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		0		1		1		2	0	3	1		0	0	2	1	4	0	2
Underlying area of conflict	F2	Passed	13	0	1	8		S	I	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		A	S	S	S1	S	S	S		0		1		1		2	1	3	1		0	2	2	0	4	0	1
Noleander	F3	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		0		1		1		2	0	3	1		0	0	2	3	4	0	2
Noleander's editing	F4	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		0		1		1		2	0	3	1		0	0	2	1	4	0	2
Noleander topic-banned	R1	Failed*	11	0	0	9		S	I	S			I	S	S	S	S		S1	S		S		S	S		0		1				2	0	3	1		0	0		1		0	2
Noleander topic-banned	R1.1	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S1	S	S	S		0		1		3		2	0	3	1		0	0	2	0	4	0	1
Discretionary sanctions	R2	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S1	S	S	S		0		1		3		2	0	3	1		0	0	2	0	4	0	1
Enforcement by block	E1	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S		S	I	S	S	S	S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		0		1		3		2	0	3	1		0	0	2	1	4	0	2
Henri Coanda - Proposals (AC=16, R=0, I=2)		Disp	S	O	A	M		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Purpose of Wikipedia	P1	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S	S	S	S	I	S		S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		1		0	1	1	1		0		1		0	0	0	0	1	1	0
Conduct and decorum	P2	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S	S	S	S	I	S		S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		1		0	1	1	1		0		1		0	0	0	0	1	1	0
Neutral point of view	P3	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S	S	S	S	I	S		S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		1		0	1	1	1		0		1		0	0	0	0	1	1	0
Editorial process	P4	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S	S	S	S	I	S		S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		1		0	1	1	1		0		1		0	0	0	0	1	1	0
Consensus	P5	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S	S	S	S	I	S		S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		1		0	1	1	1		0		1		0	0	0	0	1	1	0
Role of the Arbitration Committee	P6	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S	S	S	S	I	S		S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		1		0	1	1	1		0		1		0	0	0	0	1	1	0
Arbitration sanctions	P7	Passed	12	2	0	9		S	I	S	S	S	S	I	S		O		S1	S	S	S	O	S	S		1		0	1	1	1		0		1		0	0	0	0	1	1	0
Locus of dispute	F1	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S	S	S	S	I	S		S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		1		0	1	1	1		0		1		0	0	0	0	1	1	0
Lsorin	F2	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S	S	S	S	I	S		S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		1		0	1	1	1		0		1		0	0	0	0	1	1	0
Lsorin's response	F3	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S	S	S	S	I	S		S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		1		0	1	1	1		0		1		0	0	0	0	1	1	0
Lsorin topic-banned	R1	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S	S	S	S	I	S		S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		1		0	1	1	1		0		1		0	0	0	0	1	1	0
Scope of topic ban	R2	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S	S	S	S	I	S		S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		1		0	1	1	1		0		1		0	0	0	0	1	1	0
Enforcement by block	E1	Passed	14	0	0	9		S	I	S	S	S	S	I	S		S		S1	S	S	S	S	S	S		1		0	1	1	1		0		1		0	0	0	0	1	1	0
Monty Hall problem - Proposals (AC=14, R=0, I=4)		Disp	S	O	A	M		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Role of the Committee	P1	Failed*	8	4	0	8		O	I		O	S1	S	I	S	O	O	S	S	S	I		S	S	I		2			2	0	0		0	5	6	4	0	0			4	1
Role of the Committee	P1.1	Failed	2	1	2	7		A	I					I		A	O		S		I		S1		I		0								1	2		2				0
Role of the Committee	P1.2	Passed	9	0	0	8		S1	I			S	S	I	S	S	S	S	S		I		S		I		0				1	0		2	1	2	3	2				0
Purpose of Wikipedia	P2	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I		S	S1	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I		S	S	I		0			2	0	0		0	1	6	4	0	0			4	1
Articles should be widely understandable	P3	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I		S	S	S1	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I		S	S	I		0			2	0	0		0	1	6	4	1	0			4	1
Neutral point of view	P4	Failed*	7	0	1	7		S1	I					I	A	S	S		S	S	I		S	S	I		0							0	1	6		0	0			4	1
Neutral point of view	P4.1	Failed*	7	0	1	7		S1	I					I	A	S	S		S	S	I		S	S	I		0							0	1	6		0	0			4	1
Neutral point of view	P4.2	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I		S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S1	I		S	S	I		0			2	1	0		0	1	6	4	0	0			4	1
Editorial process	P5	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I		S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S1	I		S	S	I		0			2	1	0		0	1	6	4	0	0			4	1
Conduct and decorum	P6	Passed	11	0	0	8		S	I		S	S		I	S	S	S	S	S	S1	I		S	S	I		0			2	1			0	1	6	4	0	0			4	1
Tendentious editing	P7	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I		S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S1	I		S	S	I		0			2	1	0		0	1	6	4	0	0			4	1
Good faith and disruption	P8	Passed	11	1	0	8		S	I		S	S	S	I	O	S	S	S	S	S1	I		S	S	I		0			2	1	1		0	1	6	4	0	0			4	1
Good faith and disruption	P8.1	Failed	7	4	0	8		O	I		O	S	O	I	S1	S	O	S	S		I		S	S	I		2			2	1	2		0	1	6	4	0				4	1
Use of article talk pages	P9	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I		S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S1	I		S	S	I		0			2	1	0		0	1	6	4	0	0			4	1
Expert editors and original research	P10	Passed	10	0	2	7		A	I		A	S	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S1	I		S	S	I		2			2	1	0		0	1	6	4	0	0			4	1
Expert editors and original research	P10.1	Failed*	9	1	0	8		S1	I		S	S	S	I		S	O	S	S	S	I		S		I		0			0	3	0			3	4	2	3	1			2
Original research (mathematics)	P11	Failed	5	3	0	8			I			S		I	S	O	O		S	S1	I		O	S	I						1			0	1	6		0	0			4	1
Original research (mathematics)	P11.1	Failed	4	5	1	7		A	I			S	O	I	S	O	O		S	S1	I		O	O	I		0				1	1		0	1	6		4	0			4	1
Original research (mathematics)	P11.2	Failed	0	4	2	7			I					I		O	O		A	O	I		O	A	I										3	4		3	1			3	0
Original research (mathematics)	P11.3	Failed	4	5	0	8			I		O	S	S1	I	S	O	O		O	S	I		O		I					0	0	0		3	3	4		2	0			2
Mathematics (use of sources)	P11.4	Passed	10	0	1	7		S	I		S	S	S1	I	S	A	S	S	S	S	I		S		I		0			1	0	0		2	1	2	0	1	0			0
Article probation	P12	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I		S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S1	I		S	S	I		0			2	1	0		0	1	6	4	0	0			4	1
Statement of the dispute (coverage and presentation)	F1	Passed	10	1	0	8		S	I		S	S	S1	I	S	O	S	S	S		I		S	S	I		0			2	1	0		1	5	6	4	0				4	1
Locus of dispute	F1.1	Failed	1	0	2	7			I					I		S1	A		A		I				I										0	1		2
Statement of the dispute (external factors)	F2	Passed	10	1	0	8		S	I		S	S	S1	I	S	O	S	S	S		I		S	S	I		0			2	1	0		1	5	6	4	0				4	1
Statement of dispute (two camps)	F3	Passed	10	1	0	8		S	I		S	S	S	I		O	S	S	S	S1	I		S	S	I		0			2	1	0			5	6	4	0	0			4	1
Article has attracted expert editors	F4	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I		S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S1	I		S	S	I		1			2	1	0		1	5	6	4	4	0			4	1
Article has been _target of original research	F5	Passed	11	1	0	8		S	I		S	S	S1	I	S	O	S	S	S	S	I		S	S	I		1			2	1	0		1	5	6	4	4	2			4	1
Tendentious editing and Conduct during the case	F6	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I		S	S	S1	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I		S	S	I		1			2	1	0		5	5	6	4	5	2			4	1
Personal attacks	F6.1	Passed	9	0	2	7		S	I		S	S		I	A	S	S	S	S	A	I		S	S1	I		0			1	4			2	4	4	3	4	1			3	0
Nijdam	F7	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I		S	S	S1	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I		S	S	I		1			2	1	0		4	6	6	4	7	2			4	1
Rick Block	F8	Passed	8	0	4	6		A	I		S	S	S1	I	A	A	S	S	A	S	I		S	S	I		4			2	4	0		5	6	6	4	7	3			4	1
Gill110951	F9	Passed	10	1	1	7		S	I		S	S	S1	I	S	O	S	S	A	S	I		S	S	I		2			2	4	0		3	7	6	4	7	2			4	1
Gill110951	F9.1	Failed	3	3	1	7			I				O	I	O	S1	O		A	S	I		S		I							0		0	0	1		3	0			3
Glkanter topic banned	R1	Failed	3	4	1	7		S	I				O	I	A	O	O		S		I		O	S1	I		1					1		4	4	4		6				3	0
Glkanter topic banned	R1.1	Failed*	10	2	0	8		S	I		S	S	S1	I	S	O	O	S	S	S	I		S	S	I		2			2	4	0		5	9	9	4	7	2			4	1
Glkanter banned	R1.2	Passed	10	2	0	8		S	I		S	S	S	I	O	S	S	S	S	O	I		S	S1	I		0			0	2	0		3	3	4	2	5	3			2	0
Nijdam topic banned	R2	Failed	3	5	0	8		O	I				S1	I	O	O	O		S		I		O	S	I		4					0		5	6	6		7				4	1
Nijdam topic banned	R2.1	Passed	11	0	0	8			I		S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I		S	S1	I					1	3	1		4	5	4	3	6	1			3	0
Rick Block restricted	R3	Passed	10	2	0	8		S	I		S	S	S1	I	S	S	O	S	O	S	I		S	S	I		2			2	4	0		5	6	6	4	7	3			4	1
Rick Block topic banned	R3.1	Failed*	7	3	2	7		A	I		S	S	S	I	O	O	S	S	O	S1	I		S	A	I		0			0	2	0		3	4	4	2	5	0			2	0
Restricted	R4	Failed	3	6	0	8		O	I		S		S	I	O	O	O		O		I		O	S1	I		1			1		1		3	5	4		6				3	0
Topic banned	R4.1	Failed	1	10	0	8		O	I		O		S1	I	O	O	O	O	O	O	I		O	O	I		1			2		0		4	6	6	4	7	2			4	1
Cautioned	R4.2	Failed	0	8	2	7		O	I		O	A		I	O	O	O	O	O	A	I		O		I		1			0	2			2	4	4	2	5	0			2
Gill110951 reminded	R4.3	Passed	9	1	1	7		S1	I		S	S	S	I	S	A	S	S	O	S	I		S		I		0			0	2	0		1	4	4	2	5	0			2
Discretionary sanctions	R5	Passed	10	1	1	7		S	I		S	S	S1	I	S	S	S	S	A	S	I		O	S	I		1			2	4	0		1	1	6	4	7	2			4	1
Discretionary sanctions (original research)	R6	Failed	5	7	0	8		S	I		O	S	S1	I	O	O	O	O	O	S	I		O	S	I		2			2	4	0		4	5	6	4	7	3			4	1
Enforcement by block	E1	Passed	12	0	0	8		S	I		S	S	S1	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I		S	S	I		1			2	5	0		1	6	6	4	7	2			4	1
Kehrli 2 - Proposals (AC=15, R=0, I=3)		Disp	S	O	A	M		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Purpose of Wikipedia	P1	Passed	13	0	0	8		S		S	S	S1	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I	S	S		I		0		0	1	0	2		1	2	2	3	0	0		4	3
Editorial process	P2	Passed	13	0	0	8		S		S	S	S1	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I	S	S		I		0		0	1	0	2		1	2	2	3	0	0		4	3
Advocacy	P3	Passed	13	0	0	8		S		S	S	S1	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I	S	S		I		0		0	1	0	2		1	2	2	3	0	0		4	3
Scientific notation	P4	Failed	3	8	2	7		A		A	O	S1	O	I	O	O	O	O	S	S	I	O	O		I		0		0	1	0	0		1	2	2	3	0	0		4	3
Scientific notation	P4.1	Failed	6	5	0	8		S		O			S	I	S	O	O	O	S	S1	I	O	S		I		0		0			0		1	2	2	3	0	0		4	3
Scientific notation	P4.2	Passed	13	0	0	8		S		S1	S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I	S	S		I		0		0	1	1	1		1	2	2	3	0	0		4	3
Original research and synthesis	P5	Passed	13	0	0	8		S		S	S	S1	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I	S	S		I		0		0	1	0	2		1	2	2	3	0	0		4	3
Locus of dispute	F1	Passed	13	0	0	8		S		S	S	S1	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I	S	S		I		0		0	1	0	2		1	2	2	3	0	0		4	3
Kehrli	F2	Passed	13	0	0	8		S		S	S	S1	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I	S	S		I		1		0	1	0	2		1	2	2	3	0	0		4	3
Kehrli topic banned	R1.1	Failed	6	5	1	8		S		S		S1	O	I	A	O	O	O	S	S	I	O	S		I		1		0		0	2		1	2	2	3	0	0		4	3
Kehrli topic banned	R1.2	Passed	13	0	0	8		S		S1	S	S	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I	S	S		I		1		0	1	1	2		1	2	2	3	0	0		4	3
Enforcement by block	E1	Passed	13	0	0	8		S		S	S	S1	S	I	S	S	S	S	S	S	I	S	S		I		1		0	1	0	2		2	2	2	3	0	0		4	3
Shakespeare authorship question - Proposals (AC=16, R=1, I=1)		Disp	S	O	A	M		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen		Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Purpose of Wikipedia	P1	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	1	3	1	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	1
Conduct and decorum	P2	Passed	13	0	2	8		S	S	S	S	S	A		S	S	S	S	S1	R	A	I	S	S	S		0	1	1	3	1	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	1
Editorial process	P3	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	1	3	1	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	1
Neutral point of view	P4	Passed	14	0	1	8		S	A	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	1	3	1	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	1
Discussion of minority views	P5	Passed	13	0	2	8		S	S	A	S	S	A		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	4	3	1	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	1
Single-purpose accounts	P6	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	1	3	1	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	1
Tendentious editing	P7	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	1	3	1	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	1
Talk pages	P8	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	1	3	1	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	1
Casting aspersions	P9	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	2	1	3	1	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	1
Revealing personal information	P10	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	1	3	1	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	1
Review of community sanctions	P11	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	1	3	1	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	1
Conduct on arbitration pages	P12	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	1	3	1	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	1
Problematic editing	P13	Passed	11	0	0	9			S	S1	S		S		S	S			S	R	S	I	S	S	S			1	0	0		0		0	1			0		0		1	0	1
Disruptive influence	P14	Passed	10	1	0	9		S		S1	S		O		S	S			S	R	S	I	S	S	S		0		0	0		0		0	1			0		0		1	0	1
Disruptive influences	P14.1	Failed	5	3	2	8		S	O	S	A		S1		S	O			S	R	O	I			A		0	1	0	0		0		0	1			0		0				1
Locus of dispute	F1	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	3	3	3	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	5
Persistent disruption	F2	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	3	3	3	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	5
NinaGreen	F3	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	3	3	3	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	5
Smatprt	F4	Passed	14	1	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	O		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	3	3	3	4		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	5
Discretionary sanctions	R1	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	3	3	2	5		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	5
NinaGreen banned	R2	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	3	3	2	5		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	5
Smatprt's community sanction endorsed	R3	Passed	13	0	1	8		S	A	S	S	S			S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	3	3	2			1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	5
Smatprt's community sanction endorsed, with qualification	R3.1	Failed	7	5	1	8		O	A	S	S				O	S	O	O	S1	R	S	I	O	S	S		0	1	3	3				1	5	2	3	0		3		3	0	5
Enforcement of discretionary sanctions	E1	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	3	3	2	5		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	1	5
Enforcement of decision sanctions	E2	Passed	15	0	0	9		S	S	S	S	S	S		S	S	S	S	S1	R	S	I	S	S	S		0	1	3	3	2	5		1	5	2	3	0		3		3	1	5
Proposals: 297; passed: 226 (76%); failed: 71 (24%).

For cases involving 2011 and departing 2010 arbs

Proposals for cases involving 2011 and departing 2010 arbs

Longevity - Proposals (AC=11, R=2, I=8)		Disp	S	O	A	M		Car	Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Fay	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Kni	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen		Car	Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Fay	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Kni	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Purpose of Wikipedia	P1	Passed	11	0	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	S	I			0		0	0					3		0		5	0		1	3	1	2
Conduct and decorum	P2	Passed	10	0	1	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	A	S	S	S	I			0		0	0					3		0		5	0		1	3	1	2
Conflicts of interest	P3	Passed	11	0	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	S	I			0		0	0					3		0		5	0		1	3	1	2
Editorial process	P4	Passed	11	0	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	S	I			0		0	0					3		0		5	0		1	3	1	2
Fait accompli	P5	Passed	11	0	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	S	I			0		0	0					3		0		5	0		1	3	1	2
Treatment of scientific topics	P6	Passed	10	1	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	O	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	S	I			0		0	0					3		0		5	0		1	3	1	2
Good intentions	P7	Passed	6	4	1	6		I	S	I	O	S	I	I	I	R	O	I	S1	I	O	S	R	S	O	A	S	I			0		0	0					3		0		5	0		1	3	1	2
Content disputes	P8	Passed	11	0	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	S	I			0		0	0					3		0		5	0		1	3	1	2
Locus of dispute	F1	Passed	11	0	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	S	I			0		1	0					3		0		5	1		1	3	3	2
Questions of content	F2	Passed	8	1	2	5		I	S	I	S	O	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	A	S	S	A	I			0		1	0					3		0		5	1		1	3	3	2
Group affiliations and conflicts of interest	F3	Passed	11	0	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	S	I			0		1	0					3		0		5	1		1	3	3	2
Ryoung122	F4	Passed	11	0	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	S	I			0		1	0					3		0		5	1		1	3	3	2
John J. Bulten	F5	Passed	9	2	0	6		I	S	I	O	S	I	I	I	R	O	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	S	I			1		0	0					3		0		5	1		1	3	3	2
Discretionary sanctions	R1	Passed	11	0	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	S	I			0		1	0					3		0		5	1		1	3	3	2
Ryoung122 topic-banned (suspended)	R2.1	Failed*	9	2	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	O	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	O	I			0		1	0					3		0		5	1		1	3	3	2
Ryoung122 topic-banned	R2.2	Passed	11	0	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	S	I			0		1	0					3		0		5	1		1	3	3	2
John J. Bulten banned	R3.1	Passed	11	0	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	S	I			1		1	0					3		0		5	1		1	3	3	2
John J. Bulten topic banned	R3.2	Failed	2	1	0	6		I		I	S1	O	I	I	I	R	S	I		I			R					I					0	0					2
WikiProject World's Oldest People urged	R4	Passed	11	0	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S	S	S	S	I			0		1	0					3		0		5	1		1	3	3	2
Deletion of evidence sub-pages	R5	Passed	8	1	2	5		I	S	I	S	O	I	I	I	R	A	I	S1	I	S	A	R	S	S	S	S	I			0		1	0					3		0		5	1		1	3	3	2
Enforcement of discretionary sanctions	E1	Passed	10	0	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S		S	S	I			0		1	0					3		0		5	1		1		3	2
Enforcement of decision sanctions	E2	Passed	10	0	0	6		I	S	I	S	S	I	I	I	R	S	I	S1	I	S	S	R	S		S	S	I			0		1	0					3		0		5	1		1		3	2
World War II - Proposals (AC=14, R=3, I=4)		Disp	S	O	A	M		Car	Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Fay	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Kni	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen		Car	Cas	Cha	Chl	Cor	Dav	Ele	Fay	Iri	Jcl	Joh	Kir	Kni	Mai	New	Phi	Ris	Rog	She	Sir	Xen
Purpose of Wikipedia	P1	Passed	13	0	0	8		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			1	1	1		1				0			1	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Conduct and decorum	P2	Passed	13	0	0	8		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			1	1	1		1				0			1	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
The editorial process	P3	Passed	13	0	0	8		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			1	1	1		1				0			1	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Reliable sources	P4.1	Passed	9	1	3	6		I	A	S	S		A	R	I	I	S	I	R	O	S	S1	A	S	R	S	S	S			1	1	3		1				0			1	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Reliable sources	P4.2	Failed*	12	0	1	7		I	S	S	A		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			0	1	1		0				0			0	2	0	0	2		0	0	2
Accuracy of sourcing	P5	Passed	12	0	1	7		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	A	S	R	S	S	S			1	1	1		1				0			1	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Neutral point of view	P6	Passed	12	0	1	7		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	A	S	R	S	S	S			1	1	1		1				0			1	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Casting aspersions	P7	Passed	13	0	0	8		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			1	1	1		1				0			1	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Role of the Arbitration Committee	P8	Passed	13	0	0	8		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			1	1	1		1				0			1	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Disruptive or tendentious editing	P9	Passed	13	0	0	8		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			1	1	1		1				0			1	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Problematic editing	P10	Passed	13	0	0	8		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			1	1	1		1				0			1	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Locus of dispute	F1	Passed	13	0	0	8		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			1	1	2		1				0			2	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Communicat's editing	F2	Passed	13	0	0	8		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			1	2	2		1				0			2	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Communicat's sourcing	F3	Passed	13	0	0	8		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			1	2	2		1				0			2	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Communicat's conduct	F4	Passed	13	0	0	8		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			1	2	2		1				0			2	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Communicat topic-banned	R1	Passed	13	0	0	8		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			1	2	2		1				0			2	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Communicat restricted	R2	Passed	13	0	0	8		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			1	2	2		1				0			2	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Enforcement by block	E1	Passed	13	0	0	8		I	S	S	S		S	R	I	I	S	I	R	S	S	S1	S	S	R	S	S	S			1	2	2		1				0			2	2	0	0	3		1	1	3
Proposals: 40; passed: 37 (93%); failed: 3 (8%).

• Failed*: Although receiving enough supports to pass, the proposal failed due either to preferential or conditional voting.

Arb activity

Legend

In the two tables below, the column headings have the following meanings:

• EP (eligible proposals): The total number of proposals in cases for which this arb was eligible to act (count of non-"N"s).
• I (inactive): The total number of proposals in cases for which this arb was listed on the case's "Proposed decision" talk page as inactive/away (count of "I"s); as a percentage of EP.
• R (recused): The total number of proposals in cases for which this arb was listed on the case's "Proposed decision" talk page as recused (count of "R"s); as a percentage of (EP − I).
• V (voted): The total number of proposals this arb voted to support or oppose (count of "S"s or "O"s); as a percentage of (EP - (I + R)).
• A (abstained): The total number of proposals for which this arb abstained (count of "A"s), as a percentage of (EP - (I + R)).
• DNA (did not act): The total number of proposals in cases for which this arb was listed on the case's "Proposed decision" talk page as active, but did not act (count of empty cells); as a percentage of (EP - (I + R)).
• S (supported): The total number of proposals this arb supported (count of "S"s); as a percentage of V.
• O (opposed): The total number of proposals this arb opposed (count of "O"s); as a percentage of V.
• FS (first support): The number of times this arb was first to support the proposal, which is generally indicative of having drafted the proposal (count of "S1"s); as a percentage of total number of proposals drafted.
• ATV (average (mean) time to vote), MTV (median time to vote): For all the proposals this arb acted on (i.e. supported, opposed, or abstained), the average (mean) and the median of the length of time (in days) between the first action on the proposal and this arb's action on the proposal.

Arb activity (2011)

Arb activity (2011) — case proposals

Arb	EP	I	%	R	%	V	%	A	%	DNA	%	S	%	O	%	FS	%	ATV	MTV
Casliber	337	0	0%	0	0%	301	89%	11	3%	25	7%	276	92%	25	8%	12	4%	1.1	0.0
Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry	337	200	59%	0	0%	116	85%	8	6%	13	9%	107	92%	9	8%	0	0%	3.4	2.0
Cool Hand Luke	337	32	9%	0	0%	211	69%	8	3%	86	28%	196	93%	15	7%	8	2%	4.8	1.0
Coren	337	0	0%	50	15%	172	60%	13	5%	102	36%	147	85%	25	15%	9	3%	3.8	2.0
David Fuchs	337	22	7%	0	0%	264	84%	6	2%	45	14%	241	91%	23	9%	11	3%	2.7	1.0
Elen of the Roads	337	74	22%	68	26%	155	79%	5	3%	35	18%	131	85%	24	15%	36	11%	5.6	2.0
Iridescent	337	156	46%	74	41%	42	39%	4	4%	61	57%	37	88%	5	12%	0	0%	12.2	17.0
Jclemens	337	0	0%	0	0%	313	93%	11	3%	13	4%	288	92%	25	8%	4	1%	1.6	1.0
John Vandenberg	337	40	12%	51	17%	220	89%	11	4%	15	6%	186	85%	34	15%	34	10%	3.3	3.0
Kirill Lokshin	337	0	0%	51	15%	280	98%	1	0%	5	2%	228	81%	52	19%	35	10%	4.4	2.0
Mailer diablo	337	68	20%	0	0%	212	79%	2	1%	55	20%	195	92%	17	8%	0	0%	3.6	3.0
Newyorkbrad	337	0	0%	33	10%	285	94%	15	5%	4	1%	262	92%	23	8%	89	26%	1.2	0.0
PhilKnight	337	0	0%	62	18%	242	88%	12	4%	21	8%	217	90%	25	10%	50	15%	0.4	0.0
Risker	337	110	33%	0	0%	207	91%	6	3%	14	6%	187	90%	20	10%	12	4%	4.4	3.0
Roger Davies	337	25	7%	18	6%	219	74%	1	0%	74	25%	187	85%	32	15%	21	6%	6.0	3.0
Shell Kinney	223	0	0%	0	0%	215	96%	3	1%	5	2%	187	87%	28	13%	1	0%	6.8	4.0
SirFozzie	337	17	5%	0	0%	279	87%	10	3%	31	10%	261	94%	18	6%	12	4%	1.0	1.0
Xeno	337	232	69%	0	0%	100	95%	5	5%	0	0%	95	95%	5	5%	0	0%	2.0	2.0

Arb activity (departing 2010)

Arb activity (departing 2010) — case proposals

Arb	EP	I	%	R	%	V	%	A	%	DNA	%	S	%	O	%	FS	%	ATV	MTV
Carcharoth	40	40	100%	0		0		0		0		0		0		0	0%
FayssalF	40	40	100%	0		0		0		0		0		0		0	0%
KnightLago	40	22	55%	0	0%	18	100%	0	0%	0	0%	17	94%	1	6%	0	0%	1.3	1.0