Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cmmmm/Archive

< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations | Cmmmm


Cmmmm

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

07 November 2010
edit
Suspected sockpuppets
edit
Prior confirmed socks

These are prior socks,   Confirmed by checkuser:

Evidence submitted by Cirt
edit
Sock of User:Cmmmm, same exact behavior as blocked sock, User:Clearcrash1
  1. Compare with contribs of Clearcrash1 (talk · contribs).
  2. When compared with Clearcrash1 (talk · contribs) - same anti-Muslim behavior.
  3. When compared with Clearcrash1 (talk · contribs) - same overloading portals with Mormon related material.
  4. Note userpage, created to make it as a bluelink, with one-line bit of text.
  5. 79.209.115.203 (talk · contribs) = similar to prior socks, see contribs, Jehovah's Witnesses edits.
  6. For example see edits by a blocked sock of User:Cmmmm, Clearcrash1 (talk · contribs), at [1].
Disruption and POV pushing causing problems across multiple pages

Disruption and POV pushing by Xpjohn (talk · contribs) has pushed several pages into deletion discussions that were otherwise unnecessary, and due to this sock's disruptive activity, a waste of Wikipedia editors' time:

  1. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Television/Selected picture/21
  2. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Film/Selected picture/25
  3. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Film/Selected picture/24

-- Cirt (talk) 11:53, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Auto-generated every six hours.

Comments by accused parties   
edit

See Defending yourself against claims.

I admit that my edits are wrong, please give me the chance to be a good editor.Xpjohn (talk) 13:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The sock accounts of Cmmmm (talk · contribs) should be indef blocked. The main sockmaster account should be blocked of a duration up to judgment of reviewing admin. The sock should refrain from socking as with Clearcrash1 (talk · contribs), and stick to its main account Cmmmm (talk · contribs). -- Cirt (talk) 13:24, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I admit that I´m Cmmmm but I can not stop editing because I´m addicted to wikipedia.Xpjohn (talk) 15:48, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
edit
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
edit

  Declined – Cmmmm and Clearcrash1 are   Stale, so there is nothing to check by. This will need to be determined on behavioral evidence. –MuZemike 01:41, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no worries, but still the behavioral evidence is quite obvious, would respectfully request an evaluating admin to take action here based on that behavior pattern. -- Cirt (talk) 16:33, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm inclined to say the behavioral patterns are extremely similar, but as I'm involved with this user, I'm not blocking. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 13:50, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Request reviewing admin that evaluates the behavioral evidence, to block the socks indef, and the main sockmaster account for a duration up to judgment of the admin. -- Cirt (talk) 13:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Who it is a sock of, I'm not sure. It could very likely be Cmmmm, it could be someone else, but it's clearly a sock. No one finds portals on their first day and sets out to disrupt them. It's like hitting the submarine on your first turn of Battleship (it's a game, please someone know what it is...) Quacks like a duck. It's rabbit duck season admins. Sven Manguard Talk 15:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Sven Manguard (talk · contribs) that WP:DUCK applies here and the socks and sockmaster should be blocked. -- Cirt (talk) 15:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, this ended exactly as easily as I could have hoped for. The person admitted to being Cmmmm. It's on my talk page. Sven Manguard Talk 16:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Cmmmm/Archive&oldid=1036398667"
  NODES
admin 8
Note 3
Project 1
USERS 2