Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 December 15

December 15

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 06:44, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Project U.S. Roads/NC (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The massive debate is over and the template is no longer needed to be in {{Project U.S. Roads}}. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 23:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to keep. RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 06:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Energy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Seems a very detailed template for order of magnitude comparison. May be replaced with a template which covers larger steps, i.e. 1-10, 11-10, 21-30 Inwind 18:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The template was deleted as requested by consensus of the members of the WikiProject — the only users to use this template. Samsara (talk  contribs) 10:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Astronomical objects/Structure (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 06:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox GA State Route (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per WT:GASH, all uses of this template have been replaced with {{Infobox road}}, making Infobox GA State Route redundant. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 01:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to keep. RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 07:00, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dmoz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

There is little use providing links to external web directories on articles, this template is therefore not useful and is skating very close to link spam. Peta 01:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The template is no longer marked as a candidate for deletion. (This has been true for several days, AFAICT.) Does that mean that this discussion should be closed with a conclusion of "Keep"? --orlady 17:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page is tagged, actually. —Wrathchild (talk) 19:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to keep. RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 07:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USFBullsCoach (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is a frivolous template. I can understand having football coach templates for teams with more illustrious football histories, but the University of South Florida has only had a football team for 10 years, and only one head coach (you can see his name is the only one in the template). Delete. --Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 02:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

blahedits 04:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't see "Bad faith" anywhere on that page. I even searched. However, this doesn't meet speedy keep since there was another delete vote other than the nominator. I have changed my recommendation accordingly. --MECUtalk 14:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
  NODES
Idea 2
idea 2
Note 2
Project 15
USERS 1