Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 March 18

March 18

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DRV-user (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm not sure exactly what the use of this template is. It appears to be an indication that the user is a single-purpose account. There's only one transclusion so far, and that's the creator of this template, who appears to have no other contributions. — sunstar nettalk 19:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:October 2006 Deprecated See Also Templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:See also2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:See also3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:See also4 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:See also5 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:See also6 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:See also7 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Seealso2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Seealso3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Seealso4 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Seealso5 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Seealso6 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Seealso7 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Seealso8 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Have all been deprecated since October, have a suitable replacement, and have no transclusions or significant incoming links. ^demon[omg plz] 18:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:October 2006 Deprecated Warning Templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all, per both the debate and CSD G6. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NC0-n (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:NPOV user-n (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Testa-n (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Vw5-n (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Have all been deprecated since October, have a suitable replacement, and have no transclusions or significant incoming links. ^demon[omg plz] 18:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:October 2006 Deprecated Banning Templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bonaparte sock (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Bonaparte-sock (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Dick Witham (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Dickwitham (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:DinkSock (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Imposter-m (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Impostor-m (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Mascotguy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Indefblock-vandalism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:BBIH (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Indefblockeduser-nocat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Have all been deprecated since October, have a suitable replacement, and have no transclusions or significant incoming links. ^demon[omg plz] 18:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 15:02, Sunday, 18 March 2007[reply]

Comment: Indefblock-vandalism and BBIH were added after nom opened. They were similarly related and had been orphaned the next month. ^demon[omg plz] 21:38, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Indefblockeduser-nocat added as well. Last one I swear, as it's the last deprecated banning template. ^demon[omg plz] 21:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete per long-standing precedent. >Radiant< 10:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Warningimages (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Wikipedia:No disclaimer templates. — — Jack · talk · 15:02, Sunday, 18 March 2007

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:6 July 2005 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I don't think there's any precedent to create such a template. While interesting, and having these for each day forever would be cool, it's hardly encyclopedic and has only a few uses. Thus, it should be deleted. Jaredtalk13:33, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Postcode Templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all, per debate and CSD G6 (housekeeping). Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PostcodeAL (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeBR (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeCB (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeCM (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeCO (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeCR (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeDA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeEN (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeGU (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeHA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeIG (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeKT (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeHP (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeRH (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeRM (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeSM (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:PostcodeTW (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Postcode TW (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (redirect)
Template:PostcodeUB (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Each of the template contents were only used in one article, so contents have been copied into article, leaving the templates obsolete. — WOSlinker 12:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:29, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Devil Wears Prada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The cast and crew and film studio are unnecessary in a template, being redundant to article information and not directly related. There are only 5 articles dealing with The Devil Wears Prada, which can all link to each other in the article and in a See also section. –Pomte 11:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As long as there is more than 3 articles related to the film it should be removed and hello it's easier to use template than looking at See also section.--HW-Barnstar PLS 13:53, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete - the purpose of templates should not be to communicate content (as an extremely general generalization; infoboxes might be an exception, but then again they don't communicate information, their parameters do), so when all items in this template related to communicating information are removed, there are just 3 links from one The Devil Wears Prada article to another, and that can easily be put in See also or in prose. GracenotesT § 14:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete completely; don't substitute. The Meryl Streep article lists every film she has appeared in, and a chunky template for each film isn't required. Addhoc 15:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete before every actor article is clogged with a template about every film they have starred in. There is a search box to the left for a reason, and, failing that, click on the wikilink that is already there. --Steve (Stephen) talk 21:33, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete, don't substitute Just another infobox which clogs up space. If you look at this in the context of the people involved, you would add this to the article for every actor that was in the film. Imagine if there was one of these templates for each and every film documented on WP within an actor's profile. The articles would get enormous and also clogged with Infoboxes. thewinchester 08:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete with extreme prejudice. Not just the actors, but also the studio articles would be ruined if per-movie templates were to be inflicted upon them. This sort of horror, while presumably well-intentioned, must be nipped in the bud! Xtifr tälk 22:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, navigational template should only be used for things that are linked by a defining characteristic -- we can't have one for every single film. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 21:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, and I say this as the person who wrote and created the articles about both the book and the movie. I was flattered when this template was created, but I really didn't think it was necessary. Struck me as rather fanboyish, actually, and given that I'm trying to cut the movie article down to size any K I can get back from this is fine. As for Hotwiki's objection, all the relevant articles are multiply linked from each other to begin with, and I got rid of the See Also section in the movie article when it was suggested in PR. Daniel Case 01:21, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:41, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2006 J. League Division 1 Results (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The corresponding articles have been deleted. — Punkmorten 09:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Obsolete road infoboxes

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Routeboxint (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Routeboxint/loopdirsub (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Routeboxint/regdirsub (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Routeboxint/shortdirsub (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Routeboxint subSR (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Routeboxint subSR no (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Routeboxint subSR yes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Routeboxint/quick (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Routeboxus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Routeboxus/state (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A collection of redirects and pieces of old code. Routeboxint, Routeboxint/quick and Routeboxus redirect to {{Infobox Interstate}}, {{Infobox Interstate/quick}}, and {{Infobox U.S. Route}}, respectively, and are no longer used. The remaining templates are unused fragments of code. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 04:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Wonder Showzen episode (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Infobox Wonder Showzen season 1 episode list (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Infobox Wonder Showzen season 2 episode list (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Infobox Wonder Showzen season episode list (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Yet another showspecific infobox that could be replaced with {{Infobox Television episode}}. --TheDJ (talkcontribsWikiProject Television) 01:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:49, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aramark (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

nonfelpful infobox on private company; only lists directors, only one of whom is notable enough for a WP article — UnitedStatesian 01:53, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was I guess the redirect works as well. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Confuse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Duplicate of more widely-used Template:Distinguish. — jnestorius(talk) 00:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. However, the other two templates were not nominated for deletion and should be listed to establish consensus on them. ^demon[omg plz] 18:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Survouttwice (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unneeded. All Survivors that were voted out played twice and were only voted out once are listed here. That means all other that played twice were voted out, making this template redundant.--TeckWiz ParlateContribs@ 01:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, the table is pointless and obviously redundant as TechWiz said. It should be deleted, and fast! Survivorfan101 11:34, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This does not look redundant to me as it's a separate list of names. But it is unnecessary as a template and should instead be a list in some article if it is significant. There are too many templates on each Survivor's article and this one in particular doesn't provide a strong link between the contestants listed. I would support deleting {{Survtwice}} and {{Survnovote}} as well. –Pomte 15:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kirby misc (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Small and unnecessary. — A Link to the Past (talk) 20:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
  NODES
admin 1
Idea 1
idea 1
Note 13
Project 2