Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 11

April 11

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 19. Primefac (talk) 11:17, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:26, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no useful content. 74.205.219.246 (talk) 18:30, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Content was merged to Template:Moncton Wildcats. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:36, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, there is also a {{SaskatoonCoach}} out there as well. You should probably include it as similar. Flibirigit (talk) 12:55, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete the templates. The category will not be empty. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

merged with parent articles (with attribution) per this thread and subsequent TfD discussions. Frietjes (talk) 14:43, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:16, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. The templates are already orphaned. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:34, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Using Module:Sports table in template space is now deactivated per this discussion. We are merging table into articles with leaving attribution like this. This discussion is only decided whether we should actually delete after merging. (Note G7 not apply here). These templates originally only used in ~four articles Hhkohh (talk) 07:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See also Frietjes previous TfD nomination Hhkohh (talk) 07:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note Template:2018 OFC Champions League group tables was previously merged from Template:2018 OFC Champions League Group A, Template:2018 OFC Champions League Group B, Template:2018 OFC Champions League Group C and Template:2018 OFC Champions League Group D Hhkohh (talk) 07:49, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 07:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted per T2. The template violates WP:AGF and WP:BITE. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:44, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need for an "only warning" for good-faith mistakes like MOS violations, all uses of this template would be unhelpful WP:BITEing Tornado chaser (talk) 05:05, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete obviously this is not necessary. The user who just created it has enough troubles already, and ought not to be messing around with warning templates without discussion... --IamNotU (talk) 12:18, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
  NODES
Association 5
Note 5
Project 3