Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Assessment/2012


  • Anime Festival Asia - This article had quite a reliable link. If possible, please review it. Thank you. Kelvintjy 09.15, 28 october 2012 (UTC)
Assessed DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Assessed DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Assessed DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 12:13, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
C class. Refer to a GA class article to get an idea on the structure. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 07:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm assessing it as start class. There are issues with the format and factuality in the article. For example, you stated the companies obtained the license in that year yet sourced it with the release information for the first volume. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 10:17, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but someone else put that in. Mind if I ask if you can be more specific so's I can double check? Ominae (talk) 21:06, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Correct assessment. You could also assess it without leaving it here if you haven't made significant contributions to that article. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 13:06, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a process governed by rules. You can request assessments for any article at any time. Anyway, the current assessment appears to be accurate. Keep in mind that the B-class criteria are typically interpreted more strictly in case of lists to compensate for the absence of a list counterpart to WP:GAN. Goodraise 16:35, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, good to know. Just wanted it to get checked out and everything. JaykeBird (talk) 11:18, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Happy World! - This article had been updated for quite some time already. If possible, please review it. Thank you. Kelvintjy 10.40, 28 october 2012 (UTC)
Done. G.A.Stalk 04:47, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Needs improvement on concision and removal of trivia facts. C class. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 12:13, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Assessed DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 12:13, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'll rate it myself. Sourced everywhere, with filled summaries so I'm going to assess it as a B. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 02:56, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Endorsed, did not see the request earlier. G.A.Stalk 07:17, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done. G.A.Stalk 04:47, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed the structure but still C class. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 13:06, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'd fail it for B1, B2 and B3 just cause of the terminology section. Need other's opinion for this. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 12:13, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Assessment endorsed. The terminology items can probably be explained in the plot section (one or two sentences at most for each). G.A.Stalk 04:47, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Assessed DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have assessed it and determined its rating will be unchanged. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 07:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  NODES
Idea 1
idea 1
Note 3
Project 5