Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geology

Latest comment: 14 days ago by Panamitsu in topic Auckland meteorite
 Main Organization Participants Open tasks Assessment Peer reviews Resources Showcase 

Adolf Peretti draft at AfC

edit
  Resolved

On behalf of the subject and as part of my work at Beutler Ink, I have submitted a draft article about Adolf Peretti for review, if any project members are interested in taking a look. I have disclosed my COI on the draft and its Talk page, and will avoid editing the main space. Thanks! Inkian Jason (talk) 18:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The draft was taken live. Thanks! Inkian Jason (talk) 19:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rename/Move of all tectonic plate names - Proposal discussion

edit

A proposal to rename/move the articles for Earth's tectonic plates is being discussed at Talk:Eurasian_Plate#Requested_move_6_October_2024. The rename involves changing the word "plate" to lowercase; for example, change from e.g. "Eurasian Plate" to "Eurasian plate". The proposal currently lists 74 plates. Participation in the discussion is welcome. GeoWriter (talk) 11:59, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

This RM to lowercase the world's tectonic plates was relisted on October 15. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

edit
 

Hello,
Please note that Longshore drift, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
Delivered by MusikBot talk 00:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI teamReply

Good article reassessment for Earth's magnetic field

edit

Earth's magnetic field has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Eric & Matthew Gilbert, PhD sites being used as a reference on mountaineering and peak heights

edit

I've started a reliable sources discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Eric_&_Matthew_Gilbert,_PhD_site_at_https://www.countryhighpoints.com/about/ Is there website of any credibility for anything mountain/geology related? https://www.countryhighpoints.com/about/ I've seen this WP:SPS used to support claims related to mountains. Eric has an h-index of 5, and being cited by peers in things like gas valve safety, but not on geology matter and I would for example not cite a geologist for mechanical engineering stuff. I don't think they clear the WP:EXPERTSPS hurdle for mountain peaks. Graywalls (talk) 13:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Also, argument over sourcing for mountain related values like heights, and discussion about the source peakbagger.com at Talk:Mount_Rainier Graywalls (talk) 05:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Geyser

edit

Geyser has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

An RM to lowercase named fracture zones

edit

Talk:Mendocino Fracture Zone#Requested move 20 November 2024 may be of interest to editors here, a request to lowercase names of multiple named fracture zones. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Dal Lake

edit

Dal Lake has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Auckland meteorite

edit

I know this is a long shot but the article Auckland (meteorite) is in need of expansion for the scientific description of it, by using this source. I'd like to get it to a good article eventually but I don't understand the technical stuff so I'd like to ask for help. ―Panamitsu (talk) 01:56, 18 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
COMMUNITY 1
Note 2
Project 17
Verify 1